R. v. Gruenke,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Stevenson, William; Iacobucci, Frank |
| Date | 24 October 1991 |
| Citation | [1991] 3 SCR 263,[1991] SCJ No 80 (QL),7 CRR (2d) 108,[1991] ACS no 80,130 NR 161,1991 CanLII 40 (SCC),8 CR (4th) 368,67 CCC (3d) 289,6 WAC 112,[1991] 6 WWR 673,75 Man R (2d) 112 |
| Docket Number | 21410 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
305 practice notes
-
R. v. Assoun (G.E.),
...is an important part of our judicial system and an accepted tool in our search for the truth: see, for example, R. v. Gruenke , [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263, at p. 295, per L'Heureux-Dubé, J. Nor should it be assumed that the Crown cannot act as a strong advocate within this adversarial process. In ......
-
R. v. R.J.S.,
...R. v. Jones (S.), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 229; 166 N.R. 321; 43 B.C.A.C. 241; 69 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. 37]. R. v. Fosty and Gruenke, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263; 130 N.R. 161; 75 Man.R.(2d) 112; 6 W.A.C. 112; 67 C.C.C.(3d) 289, refd to. [para. John Lilburn and John Wharton for Printing and Publishing......
-
L.L.A. v. Beharriell,
...[para. 27]. Cohen and Quebec (Attorney General), Re, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 305; 27 N.R. 344, refd to. [para. 27]. R. v. Fosty and Gruenke, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263; 130 N.R. 161; 75 Man.R.(2d) 112; 6 W.A.C. 112, refd to. [para. R. v. Seaboyer and Gayme, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577; 128 N.R. 81; 48 O.A.C. 81; ......
-
R. v. Campbell (J.) and Shirose (S.), (1999) 237 N.R. 86 (SCC)
...172 A.R. 196 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 42]. R. v. Xenos (1991), 70 C.C.C.(3d) 362 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 42]. R. v. Gruenke, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263; 130 N.R. 161; 75 Man.R.(2d) 112; 6 W.A.C. 112; 67 C.C.C.(3d) 289, refd to. [para. Jones v. Smith (1999), 236 N.R. 201; 120 B.C.A.C. 161; 196 ......
Get Started for Free
249 cases
-
L.L.A. v. Beharriell, (1995) 88 O.A.C. 241 (SCC)
...[para. 27]. Cohen and Quebec (Attorney General), Re, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 305; 27 N.R. 344, refd to. [para. 27]. R. v. Fosty and Gruenke, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263; 130 N.R. 161; 75 Man.R.(2d) 112; 6 W.A.C. 112, refd to. [para. R. v. Seaboyer and Gayme, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577; 128 N.R. 81; 48 O.A.C. 81; ......
-
Canada (Transportation Safety Board) v. Carroll‑Byrne,
...3 F.C. 186; ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board), 2006 SCC 4, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 140; R. v. Gruenke, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263; Lizotte v. Aviva Insurance Company of Canada, 2016 SCC 52, [2016] 2 S.C.R. 521; R. v. National Post, 2010 SCC 16, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 477; Babcoc......
-
Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. University of Calgary,
...(4th) 20; Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v. Criminal Lawyers’ Association, 2010 SCC 23, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 815; R. v. Gruenke, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263; Pritchard v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission), 2004 SCC 31, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 809; Smith v. Jones, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 455; Canada (Attorney Gene......
-
United States of America v. Ritter, 2006 ABQB 576
...(2002), 344 A.R. 59; 2002 ABQB 335, refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. Fosty and Gruenke (1991), 130 N.R. 161; 75 Man.R.(2d) 112; 6 W.A.C. 112; 67 C.C.C.(3d) 289 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Jones v. Smith (1999), 236 N.R. 201; 120 B.C.A.C. 161; 196 W.A.C. 161; 132 C.C.C.(3d) 225 (S.C.C.), refd to. [p......
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
Reinforcing The Primacy Of Privilege
...v. American Home Assurance Co. (2002), 60 O.R. (3d) 512 (Div. Ct.). See Dodek, Solicitor-Client Privilege, at p. 1. R. v. Gruenke, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263, at p. 289; R. v. Campbell, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 565, at para. Smith v. Jones, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 455, at para. 46. R. v. McClure, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 4......
-
Internal Investigations And Disclosure Of Sensitive Information: What Protections Can Legal Privileges Offer?
...to the SCC refused. 15 Talisman, 13; Sidibé c. Banque de développement du Canada, 2018 QCCQ 9049, 52; Husky , 49. 16 R. v. Gruenke, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263. 17 Slavutych v. Baker et al., [1976] 1 SCR 254, citing John H. Wigmore, Wigmore on Evidence, McNaughton rev. ed. (Boston: Little Brown, 19......
-
Trademark Disputes Comparative Guide
...privilege is warranted outside of the above criteria on a case-by-case basis, as directed by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Gruenke, [1991] 3 SCR 263. Rule 248 prevents a party from introducing information at trial without leave of the court if the party relied on grounds of privilege i......
52 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...289, 2009 SCC 28 ......................................................................................... 177, 530 R. v. Gruenke, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263, 67 C.C.C. (3d) 289, (sub nom. R. v. Fosty) [1991] 6 W.W.R. 673 ................. 218, 219, 249, 254, 258 R. v. Guimond, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 960......
-
Table of cases
...(3d) 675 (H.C.J.) ........................................................................ 179 R. v. Fosty (sub nom. R. v. Gruenke), [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263, 67 C.C.C. (3d) 289 ....................................................................................................... 126 R. v. Hay ......
-
Table of Cases
...[1980] 1 S.C.R. 695, 106 D.L.R. (3d) 193, [1979] S.C.J. No. 124 .................................................... 14 R. v. Gruenke, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263, [1991] 6 W.W.R. 673, [1991] S.C.J. No. 80 ...................................................................................................
-
Table of cases
...R. v. Griffen (1853), 6 Cox C.C. 219 ................................................................... 213 R. v. Gruenke (1991), 67 C.C.C. (3d) 289 (S.C.C.) ....................................... 213−16 R. v. Hanna (1993), 80 C.C.C. (3d) 289 (B.C.C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused ......
Get Started for Free