R. v. A.L., 2020 BCCA 18
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Bauman; The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury; The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Case Date | January 20, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2020 BCCA 18 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
R v Settle,
...scope and purpose of admission is clear and the balance of probative force over prejudice may not be that hard to meet: compare R v L(A), 2020 BCCA 18 at paras 136-140, 191, 385 CCC (3d) 407, leave denied [2020] SCCA No. 83 (QL) (SCC No 39103). [33] It is also settled that, when dealing wit......
-
R v Dirksen,
...of the alleged bad character evidence is his failure to object to the admission of any of the impugned testimony at trial: R. v A.L., 2020 BCCA 18 at para 152, 385 CCC (3d) 407, and Bourgeois at para 37. While a lack of objections is not always fatal to the type of argument raised by Mr. Di......
-
R v Fast,
...force over prejudice may not be that hard to meet: R v Settle, 2021 ABCA 221, para 32, 28 Alta LR (7th) 215, citing R v R v L(A), 2020 BCCA 18, paras 136–140, 191, 385 CCC (3d) 407, leave denied [2020] SCCA No. 83 (QL) (SCC No 39103). The fundamental concern is to ensure that a convi......
-
R. v. R.G.S.,
...Dire 1, Part 2, the judge took the view that the Handy framework applied to similar fact evidence, and relied on R. v. A.L., 2020 BCCA 18, leave to appeal ref’d, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 83. [24] The Supreme Court recently addressed the framew......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
R v Settle,
...scope and purpose of admission is clear and the balance of probative force over prejudice may not be that hard to meet: compare R v L(A), 2020 BCCA 18 at paras 136-140, 191, 385 CCC (3d) 407, leave denied [2020] SCCA No. 83 (QL) (SCC No 39103). [33] It is also settled that, when dealing wit......
-
R v Dirksen,
...of the alleged bad character evidence is his failure to object to the admission of any of the impugned testimony at trial: R. v A.L., 2020 BCCA 18 at para 152, 385 CCC (3d) 407, and Bourgeois at para 37. While a lack of objections is not always fatal to the type of argument raised by Mr. Di......
-
R v Fast,
...force over prejudice may not be that hard to meet: R v Settle, 2021 ABCA 221, para 32, 28 Alta LR (7th) 215, citing R v R v L(A), 2020 BCCA 18, paras 136–140, 191, 385 CCC (3d) 407, leave denied [2020] SCCA No. 83 (QL) (SCC No 39103). The fundamental concern is to ensure that a convi......
-
R. v. MRS, 2020 ONCA 667
...have fallen into issue) to explain a delay in leaving the relationship or in reporting the abuse: F.(D.S.), at para. 26; R. v. A.L., 2020 BCCA 18, 385 C.C.C. (3d) 407, at paras. 139, 191, leave to appeal refused, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 83. The common availability of probative lines of reasonin......
Request a trial to view additional results