R. v. Langan, 2020 SCC 33
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas |
| Citation | 2020 SCC 33 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 39019 |
| Date | 05 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 practice notes
-
R. v. T.J.F.,
...remains an accurate statement of the law, since then, the Supreme Court of Canada released several brief oral decisions (R. v. Langan, 2020 SCC 33; R. v. Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34; R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36; R. v. Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R.......
-
R v Mela,
...2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687; R v Demedeiros, 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568; R v Delmas, 2020 SCC 39, [2020] SCJ No 39 (QL); R v Langan, 2020 SCC 33, [2020] SCJ No 33 (QL); R v Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34, [2020] SCJ No 34 (QL); [33] Finally, this appeal raises the topic of “unsavoury” witness......
-
R. v. F.I.,
...decision of Bauman C.J.B.C. was in dissent, the Supreme Court allowed an appeal and adopted the reasons he gave on this point: R v Langan, 2020 SCC 33, 396 CCC (3d) 149. [54] &#x......
-
R v Dirksen,
...cigarettes. In my view, it was not, in the circumstances of this case, evidence of L.B.’s past sexual activity: Seaboyer and R v Langan, 2020 SCC 33. As such, a voir dire was not required and no error was committed by the trial judge in admitting this evidence without having held one. E. Ba......
Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
-
R. v. T.J.F.,
...remains an accurate statement of the law, since then, the Supreme Court of Canada released several brief oral decisions (R. v. Langan, 2020 SCC 33; R. v. Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34; R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36; R. v. Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R.......
-
R v Mela,
...2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687; R v Demedeiros, 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568; R v Delmas, 2020 SCC 39, [2020] SCJ No 39 (QL); R v Langan, 2020 SCC 33, [2020] SCJ No 33 (QL); R v Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34, [2020] SCJ No 34 (QL); [33] Finally, this appeal raises the topic of “unsavoury” witness......
-
R. v. F.I.,
...decision of Bauman C.J.B.C. was in dissent, the Supreme Court allowed an appeal and adopted the reasons he gave on this point: R v Langan, 2020 SCC 33, 396 CCC (3d) 149. [54] &#x......
-
R v Dirksen,
...cigarettes. In my view, it was not, in the circumstances of this case, evidence of L.B.’s past sexual activity: Seaboyer and R v Langan, 2020 SCC 33. As such, a voir dire was not required and no error was committed by the trial judge in admitting this evidence without having held one. E. Ba......
Request a trial to view additional results