R. v. M.B.
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Laskin, Goudge and Epstein, JJ.A. |
| Date | 27 January 2011 |
| Citation | [2011] O.A.C. Uned. 49,2011 ONCA 76,[2011] O.A.C. Uned. 49 (CA) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
36 practice notes
-
R. v. Briscoe (M.E.),
...al., [2001] B.C.T.C. 997; 93 B.C.L.R.(3d) 228; 2001 BCSC 997, refd to. [para. 348]. R. v. M.B., [2011] O.A.C. Uned. 49; 83 C.R.(6th) 153; 2011 ONCA 76, refd to. [para. 349]. Singh et al. v. Bains, [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 834; [2007] B.C.W.L.D. 6416; 2007 BCSC 1500, refd to. [para. 355]. R. v.......
-
Character Evidence: Primary Materiality
...the Crown offers as similar fact evidence does not mean that the trial judge must go so far as to decide that the accused is 83 R v B(M) , 2011 ONCA 76; R v Dueck , 2011 SKCA 45. In Dorsey , above note 76, the trial judge erroneously instructed the jury not to consider tainting where there ......
-
Table of cases
...................................................................... 211, 213 R. v. B.(M.) (2011), 267 C.C.C. (3d) 72, [2011] O.J. No. 428, 2011 ONCA 76 ............................................................................................... 67 R. v. B.(O.) (1995), 146 N.S.R. (2d) 265......
-
Table of Cases
...AR 351 (CA) ............................ 45 Mathisen , R v , 2008 ONCA 747 ................................................ 204 MB , R v , 2011 ONCA 76 ...................................................... 220 MB , R v , 2018 ONCA 399 ............................................ . 229, 465......
Get Started for Free
21 cases
-
R. v. Briscoe (M.E.)
...al., [2001] B.C.T.C. 997; 93 B.C.L.R.(3d) 228; 2001 BCSC 997, refd to. [para. 348]. R. v. M.B., [2011] O.A.C. Uned. 49; 83 C.R.(6th) 153; 2011 ONCA 76, refd to. [para. 349]. Singh et al. v. Bains, [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 834; [2007] B.C.W.L.D. 6416; 2007 BCSC 1500, refd to. [para. 355]. R. v.......
-
R. v. Taheri
...(3d) 534, at paras. 22-23. Where this occurs, the trial judge must direct the jury that this reasoning is not permissible: R. v. M.B., 2011 ONCA 76, 267 C.C.C. (3d) 72, at paras. 30-32. Reasoning in this way undermines the presumption of innocence by reversing the burden of proof and fails ......
-
R. v. Jones
...the impact may result in the inadmissibility of the evidence: R. v. J.F. (2003), 177 C.C.C. (3d) 1 (Ont. C.A.), at para. 77; R v. M.B., 2011 ONCA 76, 267 C.C.C. (3d) 72, at para. 19.[28] The evidence led at trial in this case answered many of the questions dealing with collusion. For the fo......
-
R. v. J.C.B., (2011) 382 Sask.R. 267 (QB)
...R. v. C.R.B., [1990] 1 S.C.R. 717; 107 N.R. 241; 109 A.R. 81, refd to. [para. 44]. R. v. M.B., [2011] O.A.C. Uned. 49; 267 C.C.C.(3d) 72; 2011 ONCA 76, consd. [para. R. v. A.G. (2004), 191 O.A.C. 386; 190 C.C.C.(3d) 508 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 48]. Statutes Noticed: Criminal Code, R.S.C. 19......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 2 March 6, 2020)
...[1955] S.C.R. 16, R. v. Mallory, 2007 ONCA 46, R. v. Stirling, 2008 SCC 10, R. v. Batte (2000), 49 O.R. (3d) 321 (C.A.), R. v. M.B., 2011 ONCA 76 R. v. B., 2020 ONCA 170 Keywords: Criminal Law, Importing Drugs, R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33 R. v. A.G., 2020 ONCA 183 Keywords: Criminal Law, ......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 20 January 24, 2020)
...R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339, R. v. Mahalingan, 2008 SCC 63, R v. D.C., 2019 ONCA 442, R. v. Bartholomew, 2019 ONCA 377, R. v. M.B., 2011 ONCA 76, R. v. L.L., 2009 ONCA 413 R. v. R.S., 2020 ONCA 39 Keywords: Criminal Law, Fresh Evidence, Criminal Code, s. 486.5 R. v. R., 2020 ONCA 38 Keyw......
13 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...Mayuran , R v , 2012 SCC 31, [2012] 2 SCR 162 ........................................ 19 MB , R v , 2011 ONCA 76 ......................................................... 294 MB , R v , 2017 ONCA 653 .......................................... 616, 649, 652, 654 MC , R v , 2014 ONCA 307 . .......
-
Table of Cases
...(3d) 291 .................... 42 Mathisen , R v , 2008 ONCA 747 ......................................................... . 188 MB , R v , 2011 ONCA 76 ............................................................... . 199 MB , R v , 2018 ONCA 399 ..................................................
-
Evidentiary Issues
...cross-examination that she discussed the details of her experience with another victim prior to a police interview. There 208 In R v MB , 2011 ONCA 76, the victims disclosed at the same time and heard each other’s allegations. They subsequently used identical language in their statements to......
-
Character Evidence: Primary Materiality
...the Crown offers as similar fact evidence does not mean that the trial judge must go so far as to decide that the accused is 83 R v B(M) , 2011 ONCA 76; R v Dueck , 2011 SKCA 45. In Dorsey , above note 76, the trial judge erroneously instructed the jury not to consider tainting where there ......
Get Started for Free