R. v. Rose

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeLamer, Antonio; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil
Citation[1998] 3 SCR 262,129 CCC (3d) 449,1998 CanLII 768 (SCC),232 NR 83,40 WCB (2d) 192,40 OR (3d) 576,20 CR (5th) 246,[1998] ACS no 81,57 CRR (2d) 219,[1998] SCJ No 81 (QL),115 OAC 201,166 DLR (4th) 385
Date26 November 1998
Docket Number25448

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
268 practice notes
  • R. v. Russel (W.I.), (2013) 447 N.R. 111 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • August 1, 2013
    ...to. [para. 20, footnote 1]. R. v. Hinse (R.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 597; 189 N.R. 321, refd to. [para. 20, footnote 1]. R. v. Rose (J.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; 232 N.R. 83; 115 O.A.C. 201, refd to. [para. 20, footnote 1]. R. v. Cunningham (J.) - see Cunningham v. Lilles et al. Cunningham v. Lilles ......
  • R. v. Doiron (E.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • October 17, 2006
    ...16, refd to. [para. 121]. R. v. Charest (A.) (1990), 28 Q.A.C. 258; 76 C.R.(3d) 63 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 122]. R. v. Rose (J.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; 232 N.R. 83; 115 O.A.C. 201, refd to. [para. 124]. R. v. Wristen (A.N.) (1999), 127 O.A.C. 314; 141 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 47 O.R.(3d) 66 (C.A.), ref......
  • Endean v. British Columbia
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 20, 2016
    ...2009 ONCA 377, 95 O.R. (3d) 767; Ontario New Home Warranty Program v. Chevron Chemical Co. (1999), 46 O.R. (3d) 130; R. v. Rose, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. New Brunswick (Attorney General), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 480; Re Southam Inc. and The Queen (No. 1) (1983), 41 O.R. (......
  • R. v. Haevischer
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • April 28, 2023
    ...R. v. Tse, 2008 BCSC 867; R. v. Ali-Kashani, 2017 BCPC 358; Dersch v. Canada (Attorney General), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1505; R. v. Rose, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; R. v. McDonald, 2013 BCSC 314; Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. Rainforest Flying Squad, 2022 BCSC 429; R. v. Frederickson, 2018 BCCA 2; R. v. F......
  • Get Started for Free
215 cases
  • R. v. Russel (W.I.), (2013) 447 N.R. 111 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • August 1, 2013
    ...to. [para. 20, footnote 1]. R. v. Hinse (R.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 597; 189 N.R. 321, refd to. [para. 20, footnote 1]. R. v. Rose (J.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; 232 N.R. 83; 115 O.A.C. 201, refd to. [para. 20, footnote 1]. R. v. Cunningham (J.) - see Cunningham v. Lilles et al. Cunningham v. Lilles ......
  • R. v. Doiron (E.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • October 17, 2006
    ...16, refd to. [para. 121]. R. v. Charest (A.) (1990), 28 Q.A.C. 258; 76 C.R.(3d) 63 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 122]. R. v. Rose (J.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; 232 N.R. 83; 115 O.A.C. 201, refd to. [para. 124]. R. v. Wristen (A.N.) (1999), 127 O.A.C. 314; 141 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 47 O.R.(3d) 66 (C.A.), ref......
  • Endean v. British Columbia
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 20, 2016
    ...2009 ONCA 377, 95 O.R. (3d) 767; Ontario New Home Warranty Program v. Chevron Chemical Co. (1999), 46 O.R. (3d) 130; R. v. Rose, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. New Brunswick (Attorney General), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 480; Re Southam Inc. and The Queen (No. 1) (1983), 41 O.R. (......
  • R. v. Haevischer
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • April 28, 2023
    ...R. v. Tse, 2008 BCSC 867; R. v. Ali-Kashani, 2017 BCPC 358; Dersch v. Canada (Attorney General), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1505; R. v. Rose, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; R. v. McDonald, 2013 BCSC 314; Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. Rainforest Flying Squad, 2022 BCSC 429; R. v. Frederickson, 2018 BCCA 2; R. v. F......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (December 14 ' December 18, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 23, 2020
    ...Project: Summary of Findings & Recommendations (Toronto: Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, 2007) ("Osborne Report"), R v Rose, [1998] 3 SCR 262, Carter v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5, R v Puddicombe, 2013 ONCA 506, R v Henry, 2005 SCC 76 Louis v Poitras, 2020 ONCA 0815 Keyw......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 15 – 19, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 23, 2018
    ...ONCA 920, R. v. Bristol, 2011 ONCA 232, R. v. McGown, 2016 ONCA 575, R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, R. v. G(P), 2017 ONCA 351, R. v. Rose, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262, R. v. Suberu, 2009 SCC 33 R v. Ferdinand, 2018 ONCA 836 [Sharpe, Lauwers and van Rensburg JJ.A.] Counsel: C. Webb, for the appellant K. ......
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (July 2015)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 23, 2015
    ...as defined in section 105 of the CJA would not be contrary to the provision's intent. As the Supreme Court explained in R. v. Rose, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262, the inherent jurisdiction of superior courts can only be removed by "clear and precise statutory language". In Rouleau J.A.'s view, the la......
53 books & journal articles
  • Rights in the Criminal Process
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Fifth Edition
    • August 29, 2013
    ...closing address. 55 52 Mcneil , above note 44. 53 [1999] 3 SCR 668, 180 DLR (4th) 1 [ Mills ]. 54 ibid at para 58. 55 R v Rose , [1998] 3 SCR 262, 129 CCC (3d) 449. The CharTer of righTs and freedoms 290 e) Detention of those Found not Guilty by Reason of Mental Disorder Post-trial proceedi......
  • Rights in the Criminal Process
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Sixth Edition
    • June 22, 2021
    ...closing address. 56 53 McNeil , above note 45. 54 [1999] 3 SCR 668, 180 DLR (4th) 1 [ Mills ]. 55 Ibid at para 58. 56 R v Rose , [1998] 3 SCR 262, 129 CCC (3d) 449. THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS 310 e) Detention of Those Found Not Guilty by Reason of Mental Disorder Post-trial proceedi......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Fifth Edition
    • August 29, 2013
    ...(4th) 41 ......................... 322 R v Rodgers, [2006] 1 SCR 554, 2006 SCC 15, 266 DLR (4th) 101 .................. 294 R v Rose, [1998] 3 SCR 262, 129 CCC (3d) 449 ................................................ 289 R v Ruzic, [2001] 1 SCR 687, 153 CCC (3d) 1 ...............................
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...138 CCC (3d) 225, [1999] OJ No 3191 (CA)................................................................................. 30 R v Rose, [1998] 3 SCR 262, 129 CCC (3d) 449, [1998] SCJ No 81 ............................................................32, 513, 524, 525, 526 R v Ross, [1989] 1 S......
  • Get Started for Free