R. v. Veikle (B.), 2016 SKQB 173

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeMegaw, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,POLICE,CIVIL RIGHTS
Citation2016 SKQB 173,2015 CRIM 136
Date17 May 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R. v G.T.D., 2017 ABCA 274
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 25, 2017
    ...from any threat, whether or not you say anything. Anything you do say may be used as evidence. Do you understand?[See e.g. R v Veikle, 2016 SKQB 173 at para 41]You were arrested on a charge of … . Do you wish to say anything in answer to the charge? You are not obliged to say anything unles......
  • ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN v. AN, 2016 SKQB 378
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 21, 2016
    ...of the ASD and the administration of the test? · Did the detainee say he or she did not wish to call counsel at the roadside: R v Veikle, 2016 SKQB 173? [46] As is noted above, the question in this case is whether the police, in all the circumstances, could realistically implement the right......
  • R. v. Baillie, 2019 SKPC 6
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 22, 2019
    ...of the ASD and the administration of the test? · Did the detainee say he or she did not wish to call counsel at the roadside: R v Veikle, 2016 SKQB 173? [46] As is noted above, the question in this case is whether the police, in all the circumstances, could realistically implement the right......
3 cases
  • R. v G.T.D., 2017 ABCA 274
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 25, 2017
    ...from any threat, whether or not you say anything. Anything you do say may be used as evidence. Do you understand?[See e.g. R v Veikle, 2016 SKQB 173 at para 41]You were arrested on a charge of … . Do you wish to say anything in answer to the charge? You are not obliged to say anything unles......
  • ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN v. AN, 2016 SKQB 378
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 21, 2016
    ...of the ASD and the administration of the test? · Did the detainee say he or she did not wish to call counsel at the roadside: R v Veikle, 2016 SKQB 173? [46] As is noted above, the question in this case is whether the police, in all the circumstances, could realistically implement the right......
  • R. v. Baillie, 2019 SKPC 6
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 22, 2019
    ...of the ASD and the administration of the test? · Did the detainee say he or she did not wish to call counsel at the roadside: R v Veikle, 2016 SKQB 173? [46] As is noted above, the question in this case is whether the police, in all the circumstances, could realistically implement the right......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT