Routkovskaia v. Gibson, 2020 BCCA 84

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Newbury,The Honourable Mr. Justice Goepel,The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler
Citation2020 BCCA 84
Docket NumberCA46228
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Date09 March 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • AR v JU,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 8, 2021
    ...2020 NSCA 1 at paras 6-24, 384 CCC (3d) 461; R v Jimenez, 2020 YKCA 5, at paras 34-36, [2020] YJ No 52 (QL); Routkovskaia v Gibson, 2020 BCCA 84 at para [60] We do not doubt that Rooke ACJ’s reasons were arrived at in a judicial manner, particularly given the presumption of judicial integri......
  • M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 21, 2020
    ...the substance of the judge’s reasoning after giving oral reasons could be seen as attempting to defeat an appeal: Routkovskaia v. Gibson, 2020 BCCA 84 at paras. 12–13; Alers‑Hankey v. Solomon et al, 2000 BCCA 196 at paras. 15–17; Ewert v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCSC 279 at paras. 3......
  • M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd., 2020 BCCA 167
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 5, 2020
    ...judge’s reasons. Thus, a litigant is not entitled as of right to a transcript of the unedited oral reasons: Routkovskaia v. Gibson, 2020 BCCA 84 at para. 13. As Justice Goepel wrote in Routkovskaia, in those cases where edits in reasons may give rise to a ground of appeal, a par......
3 cases
  • AR v JU,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 8, 2021
    ...2020 NSCA 1 at paras 6-24, 384 CCC (3d) 461; R v Jimenez, 2020 YKCA 5, at paras 34-36, [2020] YJ No 52 (QL); Routkovskaia v Gibson, 2020 BCCA 84 at para [60] We do not doubt that Rooke ACJ’s reasons were arrived at in a judicial manner, particularly given the presumption of judicial integri......
  • M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 21, 2020
    ...the substance of the judge’s reasoning after giving oral reasons could be seen as attempting to defeat an appeal: Routkovskaia v. Gibson, 2020 BCCA 84 at paras. 12–13; Alers‑Hankey v. Solomon et al, 2000 BCCA 196 at paras. 15–17; Ewert v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCSC 279 at paras. 3......
  • M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd., 2020 BCCA 167
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 5, 2020
    ...judge’s reasons. Thus, a litigant is not entitled as of right to a transcript of the unedited oral reasons: Routkovskaia v. Gibson, 2020 BCCA 84 at para. 13. As Justice Goepel wrote in Routkovskaia, in those cases where edits in reasons may give rise to a ground of appeal, a par......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT