Ruszo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 296
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 12 March 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Fodor v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 218
...at paras 24-27; Rusznyak v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 255 at paras 51-57; Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 296 at paras 11-18. [68] This obligation implies a requirement to at least consider determinations granting protection to other family members, ......
-
Pava v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1239
...[22] The standard of review in relation to the first and third issue is reasonableness (Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 296 at para 6 [Ruszo, 2019]). The standard of review on the issue of state protection is more complicated. The assessment of state protection is subj......
-
Montano Alarcon v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 395
...(Rusznyak v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 255 at paras 50-53, 57; Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 296 at para 17-18; Mendoza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 251 at paras 24-26; Fodor v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 218 at......
-
Cheema v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1055
...Azhar, one would expect an express finding in this regard and an explanation for doing so: Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 296 at paras 11–12. [27] The second possibility is that while accepting that Mr. Safdar and Mr. Aslam were dangerous to Ms. Azhar, the PRRA office......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
Fodor v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 218
...at paras 24-27; Rusznyak v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 255 at paras 51-57; Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 296 at paras 11-18. [68] This obligation implies a requirement to at least consider determinations granting protection to other family members, ......
-
Pava v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1239
...[22] The standard of review in relation to the first and third issue is reasonableness (Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 296 at para 6 [Ruszo, 2019]). The standard of review on the issue of state protection is more complicated. The assessment of state protection is subj......
-
Montano Alarcon v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 395
...(Rusznyak v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 255 at paras 50-53, 57; Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 296 at para 17-18; Mendoza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 251 at paras 24-26; Fodor v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 218 at......
-
Cheema v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1055
...Azhar, one would expect an express finding in this regard and an explanation for doing so: Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 296 at paras 11–12. [27] The second possibility is that while accepting that Mr. Safdar and Mr. Aslam were dangerous to Ms. Azhar, the PRRA office......
Request a trial to view additional results