Scott et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1651

JudgeWeatherill, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateSeptember 06, 2013
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2013 BCSC 1651;[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1651 (SC);[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1651
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 5, 2022
    ...proceedings when considering whether to strike a claim under Rule 9-5(1)(a): Merchant at para. 40; Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1651 at para. 21, rev’d (but not on this point) 2017 BCCA 422. Each claim must stand or fall on the Application to the Case at Bar [86] ......
  • Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCCA 422
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 4, 2017
    ...WillcockOn appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated September 6, 2013 (Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1651, Vancouver Docket No. S127611)Counsel for the Appellant:P.B. VickeryT.A. HendersonL. RasmussenCounsel for the Respondents:D.J. Sorochan, Q.C......
  • British Columbia v. Apotex Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 4, 2022
    ...no special consideration is given for class actions; each claim must stand or fall on the pleadings: Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1651 at para. 21, rev’d on other grounds 2017 BCCA 422, leave to appeal ref’d [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 37930 (S.C.C.). [58]  ......
  • Hardy Estate v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FC 1151
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 8, 2015
    ...a fiduciary duty owed by the Crown to veterans generally. It is claimed to arise on the authority of Scott v Canada (Attorney General) , 2013 BCSC 1651. [48] The Honour of the Crown doctrine is one that evolved from the aboriginal rights context. It is a principle that Crown servants should......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 5, 2022
    ...proceedings when considering whether to strike a claim under Rule 9-5(1)(a): Merchant at para. 40; Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1651 at para. 21, rev’d (but not on this point) 2017 BCCA 422. Each claim must stand or fall on the Application to the Case at Bar [86] ......
  • Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCCA 422
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 4, 2017
    ...WillcockOn appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated September 6, 2013 (Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1651, Vancouver Docket No. S127611)Counsel for the Appellant:P.B. VickeryT.A. HendersonL. RasmussenCounsel for the Respondents:D.J. Sorochan, Q.C......
  • British Columbia v. Apotex Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 4, 2022
    ...no special consideration is given for class actions; each claim must stand or fall on the pleadings: Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1651 at para. 21, rev’d on other grounds 2017 BCCA 422, leave to appeal ref’d [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 37930 (S.C.C.). [58]  ......
  • Hardy Estate v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FC 1151
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 8, 2015
    ...a fiduciary duty owed by the Crown to veterans generally. It is claimed to arise on the authority of Scott v Canada (Attorney General) , 2013 BCSC 1651. [48] The Honour of the Crown doctrine is one that evolved from the aboriginal rights context. It is a principle that Crown servants should......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Case Note: On Benefit Reduction Class Actions
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 16, 2015
    ...members in terms of the compensation provided and the avoidance of further appeal proceedings. In Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1651, a British Columbia judge allowed a proposed class action to proceed over the objections of the federal Attorney General that it disclosed no ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT