Skyline Agriculture Financial, 2017 SKCA 26

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeLane, Jackson , Ottenbreit
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Citation2017 SKCA 26
Docket NumberCACV2697
Date31 March 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 28, 2020
    ...by this Court as not endorsing a strict construction of the BLA: Skyline Agricultural Financial Corp. v Farm Land Security Board, 2017 SKCA 26, [2017] 6 WWR 235 [160] Axcess Capital has indicated that s. 86 is the dominant enforcement tool under the BLA and I agree with that statement. It d......
  • Prince Albert Right to Life Association v Prince Albert (City), 2020 SKCA 96
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 10, 2020
    ...because it lacked any intelligible reasons. [20] She noted that in Skyline Agriculture Financial Corp. v Farm Land Security Board, 2017 SKCA 26 at para 91, quoting from Komolafe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 431 at para 11, 16 Imm LT (4th) 267, this Court acknowledged that......
  • UNIFOR, LOCAL 892 v. MOSAIC POTASH ESTERHAZY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 2018 SKQB 68
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 27, 2018
    ...para 14, [2011] 3 SCR 708) [Newfoundland Nurses]. [33] More recently, in Skyline Agriculture Financial Corp. v Farm Land Security Board, 2017 SKCA 26, [2017] 6 WWR 235 [Skyline], the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal had occasion to reiterate as follows, commencing at para. [91] In particular, r......
  • TOTAL OILFIELD RENTALS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • October 23, 2017
    ...of articulating the reasons and to outcomes. [71] Justice Jackson in Skyline Agriculture Financial Corp. v Farm Land Security Board, 2017 SKCA 26 at paras 91 to 92 dealt with the degree of scrutiny an appellate court should give to the fulsomeness of reasons offered by a tribunal. She [91] ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Kelly Panteluk Construction Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 28, 2020
    ...by this Court as not endorsing a strict construction of the BLA: Skyline Agricultural Financial Corp. v Farm Land Security Board, 2017 SKCA 26, [2017] 6 WWR 235 [160] Axcess Capital has indicated that s. 86 is the dominant enforcement tool under the BLA and I agree with that statement. It d......
  • Prince Albert Right to Life Association v Prince Albert (City), 2020 SKCA 96
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 10, 2020
    ...because it lacked any intelligible reasons. [20] She noted that in Skyline Agriculture Financial Corp. v Farm Land Security Board, 2017 SKCA 26 at para 91, quoting from Komolafe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 431 at para 11, 16 Imm LT (4th) 267, this Court acknowledged that......
  • UNIFOR, LOCAL 892 v. MOSAIC POTASH ESTERHAZY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 2018 SKQB 68
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 27, 2018
    ...para 14, [2011] 3 SCR 708) [Newfoundland Nurses]. [33] More recently, in Skyline Agriculture Financial Corp. v Farm Land Security Board, 2017 SKCA 26, [2017] 6 WWR 235 [Skyline], the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal had occasion to reiterate as follows, commencing at para. [91] In particular, r......
  • TOTAL OILFIELD RENTALS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • October 23, 2017
    ...of articulating the reasons and to outcomes. [71] Justice Jackson in Skyline Agriculture Financial Corp. v Farm Land Security Board, 2017 SKCA 26 at paras 91 to 92 dealt with the degree of scrutiny an appellate court should give to the fulsomeness of reasons offered by a tribunal. She [91] ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Digest: Unifor, Local 892 v Mosaic Potash Esterhazy Ltd. Partnership, 2018 SKQB 68
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • February 27, 2018
    ...Elizabeth Fry Society (1996), 1996 CanLII 2897 (BC CA), 136 DLR (4th) 644 Skyline Agriculture Financial Corp. v Farm Land Security Board, 2017 SKCA 26, [2017] 6 WWR 235 Steel Co. of Canada v United Steelworkers, Local 1005 (1975), 1975 CarswellOnt 1514, 9 LAC (2d) 426 Toronto (City) v Canad......
  • Digest: Unifor, Local 892 v Mosaic Potash Esterhazy Ltd. Partnership, 2018 SKQB 68
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • February 18, 2019
    ...Elizabeth Fry Society (1996), 1996 CanLII 2897 (BC CA), 136 DLR (4th) 644 Skyline Agriculture Financial Corp. v Farm Land Security Board, 2017 SKCA 26, [2017] 6 WWR 235 Steel Co. of Canada v United Steelworkers, Local 1005 (1975), 1975 CarswellOnt 1514, 9 LAC (2d) 426 Toronto (City) v Canad......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT