Stanford v. Standford, 2018 SKQB 221

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeWilkinson
Date09 August 2018
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Docket NumberDIV 214 of 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 practice notes
  • Cohabitational Relationships
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...see MacPherson v Williams, 2019 NSSC 17. Broda v Morin, 2015 SKQB 240; Reardon v Rodway, 2017 SKQB 324. See also Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221; Leonhardt v Shlahetka, 2019 SKQB See Dwyer v Bussey, 2017 NLCA 68. Ibid. Thew v Nichol, 2015 ABQB 556; Marriott v Stone, 2016 NSSC 183. See Ke......
  • Cohabitational Relationships
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...see MacPherson v Williams, 2019 NSSC 17. Broda v Morin, 2015 SKQB 240; Reardon v Rodway, 2017 SKQB 324. See also Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221; Leonhardt v Shlahetka, 2019 SKQB Chapter 3: Cohabitational Relationships prescribed conditions, New Brunswick, Newfoundland54 and Labrador,55 ......
  • Carruthers v. Carruthers and Whiteshore Land & Cattle, 2019 SKQB 7
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 9, 2019
    ...the interest of the third party in the family property, in addition to any other relevant fact or circumstance: Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221 [Stanford]. [160] Citing this section, Brent argues that an unequal division is required to account for Janice’s purchase of his parents’ shares......
  • Digest: Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • August 18, 2019
    ...as: 2018 SKQB 221 Docket Number: DIV 214/16 JCS , QB18220 Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2019-08-18 Judges: Wilkinson Subjects: Family Law � Division of Family Property � Exemptions Family Law � Division of Family Property � Unequal Division � Express Trust Family Law � Division of Fam......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Carruthers v. Carruthers and Whiteshore Land & Cattle, 2019 SKQB 7
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 9, 2019
    ...the interest of the third party in the family property, in addition to any other relevant fact or circumstance: Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221 [Stanford]. [160] Citing this section, Brent argues that an unequal division is required to account for Janice’s purchase of his parents’ shares......
  • TYACKE v TYACKE, 2019 SKQB 271
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • October 25, 2019
    ...SKCA 77, [2014] 11 WWR 513; Tether v Tether, 2008 SKCA 126, 56 RFL (6th) 250; Carruthers v Carruthers, 2019 SKQB 7; Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221; Thompson v Thompson, 2004 SKQB 100, aff’d 2004 SKCA 169; Welch v Welch, 2001 SKQB 544, 23 RFL (5th) 414; and Wilgosh v Wilgosh, [1998] 9 WW......
  • 101082401 Saskatchewan Ltd. v. Tunnels of Little Chicago Association Ltd. et. al., 2018 SKQB 271
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • October 5, 2018
    ...[57] A further examination of each method of trust creation is enlightening. Express Trust [58] Justice Wilkinson in Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221, described express trusts 63 An express trust is created where the requirements of certainty of intention, subject, and objects of the tran......
  • RANKIN v. RANKIN,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • December 3, 2020
    ...demarcation between express trusts, resulting trusts and constructive trusts as they pertain to land. [70] In Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221, where an express trust was found, Wilkinson J. commented on Dunnison and the anomalies trust law creates within a Torrens system of land registra......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Cohabitational Relationships
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...see MacPherson v Williams, 2019 NSSC 17. Broda v Morin, 2015 SKQB 240; Reardon v Rodway, 2017 SKQB 324. See also Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221; Leonhardt v Shlahetka, 2019 SKQB Chapter 3: Cohabitational Relationships prescribed conditions, New Brunswick, Newfoundland54 and Labrador,55 ......
  • Cohabitational Relationships
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...see MacPherson v Williams, 2019 NSSC 17. Broda v Morin, 2015 SKQB 240; Reardon v Rodway, 2017 SKQB 324. See also Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221; Leonhardt v Shlahetka, 2019 SKQB See Dwyer v Bussey, 2017 NLCA 68. Ibid. Thew v Nichol, 2015 ABQB 556; Marriott v Stone, 2016 NSSC 183. See Ke......
  • Digest: Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • August 18, 2019
    ...as: 2018 SKQB 221 Docket Number: DIV 214/16 JCS , QB18220 Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2019-08-18 Judges: Wilkinson Subjects: Family Law � Division of Family Property � Exemptions Family Law � Division of Family Property � Unequal Division � Express Trust Family Law � Division of Fam......
  • Digest: Poon v Parker, 2018 SKQB 247
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • September 18, 2019
    ...v Bale, 2001 SKQB 28, 201 Sask R 306, 38 RPR (3d) 135 Rascal Trucking Ltd. v Nishi, 2013 SCC 33, [2013] 2 SCR 438 Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221 Thorsteinson v Olson, 2014 SKQB 237, [2014] 10 WWR 768, 452 Sask R 160, 100 ETR (3d) 39, 46 RPR (5th) 48 Winisky v Krivuzoff, 2003 SKQB 345, 2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT