Table of Cases

• Author: Susanne Boucher & Kenneth Landa
• Pages: 399-414

143471 Canada Inc. v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 339 ..........118, 121

Alabama v. White, 110 S. Ct. 2412 at 2416 (1990)....................................................94

Attorney-General of Quebec v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1991]

3 S.C.R. 421, 67 C.C.C. (3d) 517..............................................99, 130, 131–32, 327

Baron v. Canada, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 416, 99 D.L.R. (4th) 350,

78 C.C.C. (3d) 510 ........................................................................94, 119, 145, 147

Bisaillon v. Keable, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 60, 2 D.L.R. (4th) 193,

7 C.C.C. (3d) 385 ........................................................................162, 164, 166, 170

Blouin v. Canada, [1991] F.C.J. No. 1171, 51 F.T.R. 194 (T.D.)..............................5, 291

British Columbia Securities Commission v. Branch, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 3, 123

D.L.R. (4th) 462, 97 C.C.C. (3d) 505 ........60, 85, 99, 116, 117, 118, 119–20, 124

Brown v. Durham Regional Police Force (1998), 43 O.R. (3d) 223,

167 D.L.R. (4th) 672 (C.A.) ..............................................................................246

California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35, 100 L.Ed.2d 30 (1988) ..........................81, 82

Canada (Attorney General) v. Several Clients and Several Solicitors (2000),

189 N.S.R. (2d) 313, 2002 NSCA 44..........................................................182, 183

Canada Post Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1995] O.J. No. 126,

95 C.C.C. (3d) 568 (Gen. Div.) ..........................................................................194

Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Attorney-General for New Brunswick et al.,

[1991] 3 S.C.R. 459, 85 D.L.R. (4th) 57, 67 C.C.C. (3d) 544 ............................130

399

c

Table of Cases

CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, (1998),

171 D.L.R. (4th) 733, 133 C.C.C. (3d) 426 ............................................................91

CBC v. Dagenais, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835, 120 D.L.R. (4th) 12 ....................................166

Chartier v. The Attorney-General of Quebec, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 474,

104 D.L.R. (3d) 321, 48 C.C.C. (2d) 34 ..............................................................142

Cloutier v. Langlois, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 158, 53 C.C.C. (3d) 257 ..........99, 199, 233, 234,

....................................................................................................235, 236, 237, 250

Codd v. Cabe (1876), 1 Ex. D. 352, 45 L.J. M.C. 101..................................................198

Colet v. The Queen, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 2, 119 D.L.R. (3d) 521, 57 C.C.C. (2d) 105........95

Comité paritaire de l’industrie de la chemise v. Potash; R. v. Potash,

[1994] 2 S.C.R. 406, 115 D.L.R. (4th) 702, 91 C.C.C. (3d) 371 ........118, 121, 286

Cottrell Transport Inc. v. Director of Investigation & Research (1987),

19 C.P.R. (3d) 117 (Ont. H.C.J.), aff’d (1988), 26 O.A.C. 378 ..........................372

Cuddy Chicks Ltd. v. Ontario (Labour Relations Board) (1991),

81 D.L.R. (4th) 121, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 5, 50 Admin. L.R. 44 ..............................265

Dalglish v. Jarvie (1850), 2 Mac. & G. 231, 42 E.R. 89 ....................................207, 312

Descôteaux v. Mierzwinski, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 860, 141 D.L.R. (3d) 590....178, 180, 181

Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, 476 U.S. 227, 106 S. Ct. 1819 (1986)............70

Dubois v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 366, 26 D.L.R. (4th) 481,

25 C.C.C. (3d) 221 ..............................................................................................298

Eccles v. Bourque, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739, (1974) 50 D.L.R. (3d) 753,

19 C.C.C. (2d) 129 ................................................................................95, 195, 285

Eddy v. Moore, 5 Wash. App. 334 (1971)......................................................................56

Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624,

151 D.L.R. (4th) 577 ..............................................................................................18

Entick v. Carrington, (1765), 19 State Tr. 1029..............................................2, 90, 102

Festing v. Canada (Attorney General) (2003), 172 C.C.C. (3d) 321 (B.C.C.A.),

(2001) 206 D.L.R. (4th) 98, (2000) 31 C.R. (5th) 203

(B.C.S.C.)......................................................................182, 183, 185, 186, 187, 188

Fieldhouse v. Kent Institution (1995), 98 C.C.C. (3d) (B.C.C.A.)............................375

Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) ..................................................................213

Gallaird v. Laxton (1862), 2 B. & S. 363, 31 L.J. M.C. 123, 9 Cox C.C. 127,

121 E.R. 1109 ......................................................................................................198

Hunter et al. v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, 14 C.C.C. (3d) 97,

11 D.L.R. (4th) 641....................2, 6, 16, 26, 27, 37, 84, 89, 95, 96, 98, 99, 119,

............................................................121, 126, 143, 144, 145, 189, 220, 233, 286

Illinois v. Rodriguez, 110 S. Ct. 2793 (1990)....................................................221, 232

400 • Understanding Section 8: Search, Seizure, and the Canadian Constitution