Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

Waldman v. Thomson Reuters Corp. et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 1138

Document Cited authorities 25 Cited in 28 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgePerell, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 21, 2012
JurisdictionOntario
Citations[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 1138;2012 ONSC 1138;[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 1138 (SC)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
26 practice notes
  • Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 12, 2022
    ...and 2013 ONSC 5086. [122] [2009] O.J. No. 4366 (S.C.J.), aff'd [2010] O.J. No. 3056 (Div. Ct.). [123] [2002] 1 S.C.R. 595. [124] 2012 ONSC 1138 [125] MacKinnon v. Pfizer Canada Inc.2022 BCCA 151, var’g 2021 BCSC 1093; Sharp v. Royal Mutual Funds Inc., 2021 BCCA [126] Batten v. B......
  • Twenty Years Later: What Are the Risks Faced By Plaintiffs’ Counsel, and How Have These Risks Changed?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 10-1-2, January 2015
    • January 1, 2015
    ...as “more user-friendly than author-friendly,”180 174 Waldman, above note 172 at para 17. 175 Waldman v Thomson Reuters Corp, 2012 ONSC 1138 (despite the style of cause, the parties agreed by consent at the certification hearing to drop the parent company from the litigation). 176 See Kalajd......
  • The Evolution and Devolution of Aggregate Damages as a Common Issue
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 10-1-2, January 2015
    • January 1, 2015
    ...as “more user-friendly than author-friendly,”180 174 Waldman, above note 172 at para 17. 175 Waldman v Thomson Reuters Corp, 2012 ONSC 1138 (despite the style of cause, the parties agreed by consent at the certification hearing to drop the parent company from the litigation). 176 See Kalajd......
  • Editor-in-chief’s Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 10-1-2, January 2015
    • January 1, 2015
    ...as “more user-friendly than author-friendly,”180 174 Waldman, above note 172 at para 17. 175 Waldman v Thomson Reuters Corp, 2012 ONSC 1138 (despite the style of cause, the parties agreed by consent at the certification hearing to drop the parent company from the litigation). 176 See Kalajd......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 12, 2022
    ...and 2013 ONSC 5086. [122] [2009] O.J. No. 4366 (S.C.J.), aff'd [2010] O.J. No. 3056 (Div. Ct.). [123] [2002] 1 S.C.R. 595. [124] 2012 ONSC 1138 [125] MacKinnon v. Pfizer Canada Inc.2022 BCCA 151, var’g 2021 BCSC 1093; Sharp v. Royal Mutual Funds Inc., 2021 BCCA [126] Batten v. B......
  • Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. Teranet Inc., 2012 ONSC 7120
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 14, 2012
    ...is the individual consent issue. As noted above, infringement is defined by the lack of consent. In Waldman v. Thomson Reuters Corp. , 2012 ONSC 1138, [2012] O.J. No. 792 (" Waldman ") at para. 173, the court considered a similar copyright infringement issue and reached the same conclusion.......
  • Parker v. Pfizer Canada Inc. et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 3681
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 21, 2012
    ...role, it is a gatekeeper within the parameters established by the Class Proceedings Act . See Waldman v. Thomson Reuters Corporation , 2012 ONSC 1138 at paras. 112-133. [51] It takes little evidence to open the certification gate, but a great deal of evidence and persuasion to close it. The......
  • Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. Teranet Inc., (2015) 331 O.A.C. 324 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • January 7, 2015
    ...43 O.R.(3d) 161 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 55]. Waldman v. Thomson Reuters Corp. et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 1138; 22 C.P.C.(7th) 33; 2012 ONSC 1138, leave to appeal denied [2012] O.A.C. Uned. 371; 2012 ONSC 3436 (Div. Ct.), refd to. [para. 55]. Cloud et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) e......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • BLG Monthly Update - April 2012
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 24, 2012
    ...the law on many points), holding that Waldman met the low procedural threshold for certification: Waldman v Thomson Reuters Canada Corp, 2012 ONSC 1138. The judge did narrow the scope of the class to exclude clients(who may also have a hand in the drafting), in-house and public-sector lawye......
12 books & journal articles
  • Guest Editor’s Introduction: The Past, Present, and Future of Class Actions in Canada
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 10-1-2, January 2015
    • January 1, 2015
    ...as “more user-friendly than author-friendly,”180 174 Waldman, above note 172 at para 17. 175 Waldman v Thomson Reuters Corp, 2012 ONSC 1138 (despite the style of cause, the parties agreed by consent at the certification hearing to drop the parent company from the litigation). 176 See Kalajd......
  • Beyond the Courtroom: Access to Justice, Privatization, and the Future of Class Action Research
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 10-1-2, January 2015
    • January 1, 2015
    ...as “more user-friendly than author-friendly,”180 174 Waldman, above note 172 at para 17. 175 Waldman v Thomson Reuters Corp, 2012 ONSC 1138 (despite the style of cause, the parties agreed by consent at the certification hearing to drop the parent company from the litigation). 176 See Kalajd......
  • Facets of Fairness: Kidd v Canada Life Assurance Company and the Approval of Class Action Settlements
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 10-1-2, January 2015
    • January 1, 2015
    ...as “more user-friendly than author-friendly,”180 174 Waldman, above note 172 at para 17. 175 Waldman v Thomson Reuters Corp, 2012 ONSC 1138 (despite the style of cause, the parties agreed by consent at the certification hearing to drop the parent company from the litigation). 176 See Kalajd......
  • Ontario's Class Proceedings Fund: Separating Fact From Fiction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 10-1-2, January 2015
    • January 1, 2015
    ...as “more user-friendly than author-friendly,”180 174 Waldman, above note 172 at para 17. 175 Waldman v Thomson Reuters Corp, 2012 ONSC 1138 (despite the style of cause, the parties agreed by consent at the certification hearing to drop the parent company from the litigation). 176 See Kalajd......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT