Wittenburg v. Wittenburg, 2003 ABQB 154

JudgeJohnstone, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 13, 2003
Citations2003 ABQB 154;[2003] A.R. Uned. 100 (QB);[2003] A.R. Uned. 100
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Soriano v Bacalla,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 15, 2021
    ...if he or she is within the applicable limitation period or no limitation period applies to a particular claim: Wittenburg v Wittenburg, 2003 ABQB 154 at para 16 [Wittenberg] and Boland v Carew, 2018 ABQB 317 at paras 15 and 16. In such a situation, dismissal of the first action would serve ......
  • Blume v Blume,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 11, 2022
    ...applying the old r. 244. Both of these cases were subsequently applied by Johnston J. to a divorce action in Wittenburg v Wittenburg, 2003 ABQB 154 at para. ...There is no limitation period for a divorce action or a support application under the Divorce Act. A dismissal of an action for wan......
  • Boland v Carew, 2018 ABQB 317
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 24, 2018
    ...is an outstanding claim for retroactive and ongoing child support. [15] As observed by Justice Johnstone in Wittenburg v Wittenburg, 2003 ABQB 154, there is no limitation period for a divorce action or a support application under the Divorce Act, so a dismissal of action for want of prosecu......
  • Thompson v. Thompson, (2007) 434 A.R. 250 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 10, 2007
    ...Trenchers (1972) Ltd. (1989), 99 A.R. 25; 62 D.L.R.(4th) 188 (C.A.), dist. [para. 9]. Wittenburg v. Wittenburg, [2003] A.R. Uned. 100; 2003 ABQB 154, refd to. [para. L.J.W. v. T.A.R. - see D.B.S. v. S.R.G. D.B.S. v. S.R.G., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 231; 351 N.R. 201; 391 A.R. 297; 377 W.A.C. 297; 20......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Soriano v Bacalla,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 15, 2021
    ...if he or she is within the applicable limitation period or no limitation period applies to a particular claim: Wittenburg v Wittenburg, 2003 ABQB 154 at para 16 [Wittenberg] and Boland v Carew, 2018 ABQB 317 at paras 15 and 16. In such a situation, dismissal of the first action would serve ......
  • Blume v Blume,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 11, 2022
    ...applying the old r. 244. Both of these cases were subsequently applied by Johnston J. to a divorce action in Wittenburg v Wittenburg, 2003 ABQB 154 at para. ...There is no limitation period for a divorce action or a support application under the Divorce Act. A dismissal of an action for wan......
  • Boland v Carew, 2018 ABQB 317
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 24, 2018
    ...is an outstanding claim for retroactive and ongoing child support. [15] As observed by Justice Johnstone in Wittenburg v Wittenburg, 2003 ABQB 154, there is no limitation period for a divorce action or a support application under the Divorce Act, so a dismissal of action for want of prosecu......
  • Thompson v. Thompson, (2007) 434 A.R. 250 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 10, 2007
    ...Trenchers (1972) Ltd. (1989), 99 A.R. 25; 62 D.L.R.(4th) 188 (C.A.), dist. [para. 9]. Wittenburg v. Wittenburg, [2003] A.R. Uned. 100; 2003 ABQB 154, refd to. [para. L.J.W. v. T.A.R. - see D.B.S. v. S.R.G. D.B.S. v. S.R.G., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 231; 351 N.R. 201; 391 A.R. 297; 377 W.A.C. 297; 20......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT