B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud |
| Citation | 2022 SCC 24 |
| Date | 03 June 2022 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 39558 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
35 practice notes
-
Holden v Holden,
...[under the Child Welfare Act] were met in this case, and we find no reviewable error in this regard”). [84] B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24, ¶¶ 53, 55 & 57-58 per Martin, J.A. (“To assess the best interests of a child, courts apply a multi-factorial legal standard ........
-
F. v. N., 2022 SCC 51
...582, 75 R.F.L. (8th) 251; Aldush v. Alani, 2022 ONSC 1536, 74 R.F.L. (8th) 113; Barendregt v. Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22; B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24; Gordon v. Goertz, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27; Jamali v. Gillani, 2021 BCSC 2134; Re A. (A Minor) (Abduction), [1988] 1 F.L.R. 365; S.A.G. v. C.D.G., 20......
-
S.M. v. J.A.,
...P.E.I.R. 91, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 35303 (13 June 2013); D.B.S. v. S.R.G., 2006 SCC 37, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 231; B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24. STATUTES CONSIDERED: Hoegg J.A. (Knickle J.A. concurring): Family Law Act, RSNL 1990, c. F-2, sections 47, 37(2); Divorce Act, RSC 1985, c. 3 (......
-
M.A.B. v. M.G.C.,
...features of every child and case. (Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60 (S.C.C.), at para. 13; Barendregt, at para. 97; B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24 (S.C.C.), at para. 55). The wide array of factors relevant to the best interests analysis under the CLRA allows for a uniquely tailored a......
Request a trial to view additional results
37 cases
-
F. v. N., 2022 SCC 51
...582, 75 R.F.L. (8th) 251; Aldush v. Alani, 2022 ONSC 1536, 74 R.F.L. (8th) 113; Barendregt v. Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22; B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24; Gordon v. Goertz, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27; Jamali v. Gillani, 2021 BCSC 2134; Re A. (A Minor) (Abduction), [1988] 1 F.L.R. 365; S.A.G. v. C.D.G., 20......
-
Holden v Holden,
...[under the Child Welfare Act] were met in this case, and we find no reviewable error in this regard”). [84] B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24, ¶¶ 53, 55 & 57-58 per Martin, J.A. (“To assess the best interests of a child, courts apply a multi-factorial legal standard ........
-
S.M. v. J.A.,
...P.E.I.R. 91, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 35303 (13 June 2013); D.B.S. v. S.R.G., 2006 SCC 37, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 231; B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24. STATUTES CONSIDERED: Hoegg J.A. (Knickle J.A. concurring): Family Law Act, RSNL 1990, c. F-2, sections 47, 37(2); Divorce Act, RSC 1985, c. 3 (......
-
M.A.B. v. M.G.C.,
...features of every child and case. (Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60 (S.C.C.), at para. 13; Barendregt, at para. 97; B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24 (S.C.C.), at para. 55). The wide array of factors relevant to the best interests analysis under the CLRA allows for a uniquely tailored a......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
This Month In Family Law ' June 2022
...J.D., 2022 SCC 24 Justices Wagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; C'té, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Subject matter: Standard of review | Child protection | Biological ties This appeal concerns a custody dispute......