Losing Tip #14: Openers and Closers

AuthorMarvin Catzman
Pages315-318
Losing
Tip
#14:
Openers
and
Closers
Judges
are
always
reminding lawyers
how
important their opening
and
closing remarks
are in the
hearing
of an
appeal.1
This
may be
news
to
some lawyers
out
there,
but
experienced losing counsel learned long
ago
that opening
and
closing remarks
can
mean
the
difference between
defeat2
and
victory.3
They know that
an
awful
opener
or an
even
awfuller4
closer
can
help losing counsel stand
out
from
the
rest
of the
pack.
Chief Justice Gale
used
to
tell
law
students
that "the
first
three
min-
utes
are
free."5
In
saying that,
he
meant
the
court will listen patiently
to
Mr.
justice Marvin Catzman, Court
of
Appeal
for
Ontario.
See,
for
example,
the
article
by
Moldaver
J.A.,
"Boy,
Are
Your
Opening
and
Closing
Remarks
Important
In The
Hearing
of An
Appeal" (2003),
22:1
Advocates'
Soc.J.
29
(Summer
2003)
Which,
in
these
articles,
is a
Good Thing.
Which,
in
these
articles,
is the
Other Thing.
I
looked
for
"awfuller"
in the
twenty-volume
Oxford
English
Dictionary,
2nd ed.
(Oxford: Clarendon
Press,
1989),
between "awe-struck"
and
"awkward,"
but it
wasn't
there.
Although
it
does
not
appear
to be a
real
word,
it
certainly
should
be. I
used
"awfuller"
in
draft
reasons
for
judgment once,
but the
other
two
members
of the
panel
refused
to
sign
on
unless
I
removed
it, so I
did. This
is my way of
getting
even.
This
was,
of
course,
before time dockets were invented. Now, according
to the
costs
grid,
the
first three minutes,
on a
substantial indemnity
scale,
can
cost any-
where
from
$50 to
$75.
315
Justice
Marvin
Catzman"
i
2
3
4
5

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT