R.S. v. Ontario, [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2681
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | Horkins, J. |
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Subject Matter | TORTS,PRACTICE |
Citation | [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2681,[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2681 (SC),2012 ONSC 2681 |
Date | 04 May 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
33 practice notes
-
Reddock v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONSC 5053
...Queen, 2003 FC 1463 ; Swayze v Kingston Penitentiary (Keeper Penitentiary), 2002 (S.C.J.). [161] See, for example: Seed v. Ontario, 2012 ONSC 2681; Slark v. Ontario, 2010 ONSC 1726 ; Cloud v. Canada [2004] O.J. No. 4924 (C.A.), leave to appeal to the S.C.C. ref’d [2005] S.C.C.A. No. 5......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (August 28 – September 1)
...185 , Cloud v. Canada (Attorney General) (2003), 65 O.R. (3d) 492 (Div. Ct.), rev’d (2004), 73 O.R (3d) 401 (C.A.), Seed v. Ontario, 2012 ONSC 2681, Templin v. Ontario, 2016 ONSC 7853 , Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 ONSC 3932 , , aff’d 2021 ONCA 779 , 466 D.L.R. (4th) ......
-
Twenty Years Later: What Are the Risks Faced By Plaintiffs’ Counsel, and How Have These Risks Changed?
...rates of 60 percent were charged 13 See, for example, Slark (Litigation guardian of) v Ontario, 2010 ONSC 1726 ; Seed v Ontario, 2012 ONSC 2681; Johnston v The Sheila Morrison Schools, 2010 ONSC 3334 . 14 Cloud CA, above note 10 at para 70. 15 Markson v MBNA Canada Bank, 2007 ONCA 334 [......
-
The Evolution and Devolution of Aggregate Damages as a Common Issue
...rates of 60 percent were charged 13 See, for example, Slark (Litigation guardian of) v Ontario, 2010 ONSC 1726 ; Seed v Ontario, 2012 ONSC 2681; Johnston v The Sheila Morrison Schools, 2010 ONSC 3334 . 14 Cloud CA, above note 10 at para 70. 15 Markson v MBNA Canada Bank, 2007 ONCA 334 [......
Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
-
Reddock v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONSC 5053
...Queen, 2003 FC 1463 ; Swayze v Kingston Penitentiary (Keeper Penitentiary), 2002 (S.C.J.). [161] See, for example: Seed v. Ontario, 2012 ONSC 2681; Slark v. Ontario, 2010 ONSC 1726 ; Cloud v. Canada [2004] O.J. No. 4924 (C.A.), leave to appeal to the S.C.C. ref’d [2005] S.C.C.A. No. 5......
-
Elwin et al. v. Nova Scotia Home for Colored Children et al., (2013) 339 N.S.R.(2d) 35 (SC)
...al. (2011), 311 N.S.R.(2d) 354 ; 985 A.P.R. 354 ; 2011 NSSC 484 , refd to. [para. 103]. R.S. v. Ontario, [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2681 ; 2012 ONSC 2681, refd to. [para. Seed v. Ontario - see R.S. v. Ontario. W.P. et al. v. Alberta et al. (2013), 563 A.R. 47 ; 2013 ABQB 296 , refd to. [para......
-
W.P. et al. v. Alberta et al.,
...pointed to numerous authorities in which the punitive damages issue was certified in other institutional abuse cases: Seed v Ontario , 2012 ONSC 2681; Cloud ; Rumley . [70] The Plaintiffs also pointed to s 30(1) of the Act which allows for an aggregate award of monetary relief: 30(1) The Co......
-
Kequahtooway v Saskatchewan (Government), 2018 SKCA 68
...orders: (a) he did not accept the Government’s objection to the claims period being from 1955 to the present – following Seed v Ontario, 2012 ONSC 2681 at paras 118–125, 31 CPC (7th) 76, he decided that the Court need not have evidence for every year and he was “prepared to consider the per......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (August 28 – September 1)
...185 , Cloud v. Canada (Attorney General) (2003), 65 O.R. (3d) 492 (Div. Ct.), rev’d (2004), 73 O.R (3d) 401 (C.A.), Seed v. Ontario, 2012 ONSC 2681, Templin v. Ontario, 2016 ONSC 7853 , Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 ONSC 3932 , , aff’d 2021 ONCA 779 , 466 D.L.R. (4th) ......
14 books & journal articles
-
Twenty Years Later: What Are the Risks Faced By Plaintiffs’ Counsel, and How Have These Risks Changed?
...rates of 60 percent were charged 13 See, for example, Slark (Litigation guardian of) v Ontario, 2010 ONSC 1726 ; Seed v Ontario, 2012 ONSC 2681; Johnston v The Sheila Morrison Schools, 2010 ONSC 3334 . 14 Cloud CA, above note 10 at para 70. 15 Markson v MBNA Canada Bank, 2007 ONCA 334 [......
-
The Evolution and Devolution of Aggregate Damages as a Common Issue
...rates of 60 percent were charged 13 See, for example, Slark (Litigation guardian of) v Ontario, 2010 ONSC 1726 ; Seed v Ontario, 2012 ONSC 2681; Johnston v The Sheila Morrison Schools, 2010 ONSC 3334 . 14 Cloud CA, above note 10 at para 70. 15 Markson v MBNA Canada Bank, 2007 ONCA 334 [......
-
Editor-in-chief’s Introduction
...rates of 60 percent were charged 13 See, for example, Slark (Litigation guardian of) v Ontario, 2010 ONSC 1726 ; Seed v Ontario, 2012 ONSC 2681; Johnston v The Sheila Morrison Schools, 2010 ONSC 3334 . 14 Cloud CA, above note 10 at para 70. 15 Markson v MBNA Canada Bank, 2007 ONCA 334 [......
-
Guest Editor’s Introduction: The Past, Present, and Future of Class Actions in Canada
...rates of 60 percent were charged 13 See, for example, Slark (Litigation guardian of) v Ontario, 2010 ONSC 1726 ; Seed v Ontario, 2012 ONSC 2681; Johnston v The Sheila Morrison Schools, 2010 ONSC 3334 . 14 Cloud CA, above note 10 at para 70. 15 Markson v MBNA Canada Bank, 2007 ONCA 334 [......
Request a trial to view additional results