R. v. Bazinet, (1986) 14 O.A.C. 15 (CA)

JudgeLacourcière, Cory and Tarnopolsky, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Case DateMarch 24, 1986
JurisdictionOntario
Citations(1986), 14 O.A.C. 15 (CA);1986 CanLII 108 (NS CA);1986 CanLII 108 (ON CA);54 OR (2d) 129;25 CCC (3d) 273;51 CR (3d) 139;[1986] CarswellOnt 107;[1986] OJ No 187 (QL);14 OAC 15;16 WCB 164

R. v. Bazinet (1986), 14 O.A.C. 15 (CA)

MLB headnote and full text

R. v. Bazinet

Indexed As: R. v. Bazinet

Ontario Court of Appeal

Lacourcière, Cory and Tarnopolsky, JJ.A.

March 24, 1986.

Summary:

The accused was charged with first degree murder, contrary to s. 218(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. A jury found the accused guilty of the included offence of second degree murder. The accused appealed his conviction on the grounds that certain inculpatory statements made by him should have been excluded from the evidence because he was denied his right to counsel under s. 10(b) of the Charter of Rights, and that the trial judge was wrong in withdrawing the defence of drunkenness from the jury.

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

Civil Rights - Topic 3604

Detention - What constitutes - Police attended at the accused's residence and advised that they wished to question him respecting a murder - The accused was not then a suspect - The accused voluntarily accompanied them to the station - The Ontario Court of Appeal held that the accused was not detained within s. 10(b) of the Charter, because the police made no "demand or direction" on him, he did not submit or acquiesce in a deprivation of his liberty because he reasonably believed he had no choice, he was under no physical restraint and there was no basis to compel his attendance - The court held that neither the coercive atmosphere of the station nor asking the accused to submit his clothing for examination contributed to a finding of detention - See paragraphs 21 to 35.

Civil Rights - Topic 4613

Right to counsel - Requirement of detention - Police attended at an accused's residence and advised that they wished to question him respecting a murder investigation - The accused voluntarily accompanied them to the station where, after some questioning, he gave certain inculpatory statements - The Ontario Court of Appeal held that the accused had no right to be informed of his right to counsel prior to being questioned, because he was not detained within s. 10(b) of the Charter - See paragraphs 21 to 35.

Criminal Law - Topic 4356

Procedure - Jury charge - Directions regarding intent or mens rea - Drunkenness - An accused consumed 12 bottles of beer between 1:00 p.m. and the time of a murder (8:30 to 9:30 p.m.) - However, not one witness who observed the accused attested to any degree of drunkenness - All who saw him after the killing testified that he appeared normal - The Ontario Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was correct in withdrawing the defence of drunkenness from the jury - See paragraphs 37 to 39.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122; 40 Sask.R. 122; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 481, appld. [para. 21].

R. v. Esposito (1985), 12 O.A.C. 350, dist. [para. 27].

R. v. Rodenbush and Rodenbush, 14 W.C.B. 327, dist. [para. 32].

Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, refd to. [para. 33].

Oregon v. Mathiason (1977), 429 U.S. 492, refd to. [para. 33].

California v. Beheler (1983), 103 S.Ct. 3517, refd to. [para. 34].

R. v. Gorman (1972), 9 C.C.C.(2d) 318 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 37].

Statutes Noticed:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982, sect. 10(b) [paras. 1, 18, 21, 33, 35-36].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Shorter Oxford English Dictionary [para. 29].

Webster's New World Dictionary [para. 29].

Ontario Encyclopedic Digest [para. 30].

Counsel:

Marc Rosenberg, for the appellant;

Douglas C. Hunt, Q.C., for the respondent.

This appeal was heard before Lacourcière, Cory and Tarnopolsky, JJ.A., of the Ontario Court of Appeal on December 3 and 4, 1985. The decision of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Tarnopolsky, J.A., and released on March 24, 1986.

To continue reading

Request your trial
742 practice notes
  • R. v. Douglas (R.D.), (2005) 387 A.R. 1 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 28, 2005
    ...; 24 C.C.C.(3d) 88 ; 50 C.R.(3 d) xxv; 53 O.R.(2d) 356 ; 20 C.R.R. 102 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 60, footnote 33]. R. v. Bazinet (1986), 14 O.A.C. 15; 25 C.C.C.(3d) 273 ; 51 C.R.(3d) 139 ; 54 O.R.(2d) 129 ; 1986 CarswellOnt 107 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 60, footnote 34]. R. v. Ancel......
  • R. v. T.A.V.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 30, 2001
    ...and first Civil Rights - Topic 1217 ]. Cases Noticed: R. v. Ancelet (1986), 70 A.R. 263 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17]. R. v. Bazinet (1986), 14 O.A.C. 15; 25 C.C.C.(3d) 273 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. Moran (1987), 21 O.A.C. 257; 36 C.C.C.(3d) 225 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18]. R. v. Fash (D.......
  • R. v. Swidnicki (E.S.) et al., (1999) 136 Man.R.(2d) 161 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • April 21, 1999
    ...122; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 481; 18 D.L.R.(4th) 655; [1985] 4 W.W.R. 286; 32 M.V.R. 153; 45 C.R.(3d) 97, refd to. [para. 22]. R. v. Bazinet (1986), 14 O.A.C. 15; 25 C.C.C.(3d) 273 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. Hawkins (J.G.) (1992), 102 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 91; 323 A.P.R. 91; 72 C.C.C.(3d) 524 (Nfld......
  • R. v. D.J.M., (2003) 343 A.R. 11 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 10, 2003
    ...70 A.R. 263 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (1987), 76 N.R. 240; 75 A.R. 320 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 18, footnote 25]. R. v. Bazinet (1986), 14 O.A.C. 15; 25 C.C.C.(3d) 273; 51 C.R.(3d) 139; 54 O.R.(2d) 129 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18, footnote 26]. R. v. Grafe (1987), 22 O.A.C. 280; 36 C.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
721 cases
  • R. v. Douglas (R.D.), (2005) 387 A.R. 1 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 28, 2005
    ...; 24 C.C.C.(3d) 88 ; 50 C.R.(3 d) xxv; 53 O.R.(2d) 356 ; 20 C.R.R. 102 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 60, footnote 33]. R. v. Bazinet (1986), 14 O.A.C. 15; 25 C.C.C.(3d) 273 ; 51 C.R.(3d) 139 ; 54 O.R.(2d) 129 ; 1986 CarswellOnt 107 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 60, footnote 34]. R. v. Ancel......
  • R. v. T.A.V.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 30, 2001
    ...and first Civil Rights - Topic 1217 ]. Cases Noticed: R. v. Ancelet (1986), 70 A.R. 263 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17]. R. v. Bazinet (1986), 14 O.A.C. 15; 25 C.C.C.(3d) 273 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. Moran (1987), 21 O.A.C. 257; 36 C.C.C.(3d) 225 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18]. R. v. Fash (D.......
  • R. v. Swidnicki (E.S.) et al., (1999) 136 Man.R.(2d) 161 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • April 21, 1999
    ...122; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 481; 18 D.L.R.(4th) 655; [1985] 4 W.W.R. 286; 32 M.V.R. 153; 45 C.R.(3d) 97, refd to. [para. 22]. R. v. Bazinet (1986), 14 O.A.C. 15; 25 C.C.C.(3d) 273 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. Hawkins (J.G.) (1992), 102 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 91; 323 A.P.R. 91; 72 C.C.C.(3d) 524 (Nfld......
  • R. v. D.J.M., (2003) 343 A.R. 11 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 10, 2003
    ...70 A.R. 263 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (1987), 76 N.R. 240; 75 A.R. 320 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 18, footnote 25]. R. v. Bazinet (1986), 14 O.A.C. 15; 25 C.C.C.(3d) 273; 51 C.R.(3d) 139; 54 O.R.(2d) 129 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18, footnote 26]. R. v. Grafe (1987), 22 O.A.C. 280; 36 C.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Management Of Multijurisdictional Class Actions And Of Class Actions In Montréal
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 6, 2018
    ...of 73 will be divided as follows: Group of 10: in charge of the files before a judgment on the authorization is rendered (they will have 15 or 16 files each on average). Group of 63: in charge of the files after a judgment authorizing a class action has been rendered (one or two files each)......
6 books & journal articles
  • Privacy as an Endangered Species: The False Promise of the Charter of Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Special Lectures 2001. Constitutional and Administrative Law
    • August 31, 2002
    ...brief investi-gatory detention upon reasonable suspicion, see R. v. Simpson (1993), 20 C.R. (4th) 1 (Ont. C.A.). 12 R. v. Bazinet (1986), 25 C.C.C. (3d) 273 (Ont. C.A.); R v. Smith (1986), 25 C.C.C. (3d) 361 (Ont. C.A.). 13 This is because voluntary accompaniment to the police station does ......
  • THE STANDARD OF CARE FOR CHILDREN ENGAGED IN ADULT ACTIVITIES: NOT EXACTLY CHILD'S PLAY.
    • Canada
    • December 1, 2020
    ...of motor vehicles, for example, was thought to be "unrealistic" and "inimical to public safety". When a society permits young people of 15 or 16, Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1970, c. 202, s. 18, the privilege of operating a lethal weapon like an automobile on its highways, it should require......
  • New v. old: the significant differences.
    • Canada
    • LawNow Vol. 28 No. 2, October 2003
    • October 1, 2003
    ...this presumption comes into effect has been lowered from 16 to 14 years, although the individual provinces may choose to change the age to 15 or 16 In Quebec, in the Reference re: Bill C-7 Respecting the Criminal Justice System for Young Persons [unreported March 31, 2003] (Que. C.A.) this ......
  • Childhood predictors of adult criminality: a meta-analysis drawn from the prospective longitudinal literature.
    • Canada
    • Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice Vol. 50 No. 4, July 2008
    • July 1, 2008
    ...11-14 Follow-up age 32-38 9 Ezell & Cohen (1997) Child factors: Non-community Externalizing sample concerns Male (N = 2200) Initial age 15 or 16 or 17 Follow-up age 24 10 Farrington (2000) Child factors: Community sample Internalizing Male (N = 411) concerns Initial age 8-10 Follow-up F......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 provisions
  • National Security Act, 2017 (S.C. 2019, c. 13)
    • Canada
    • Canada Gazette December 23, 2019
    • Invalid date
    ...queries and exploitations, and if the results were retained for the purpose of performing their duties or functions under section 12, 12.1, 15 or 16; and(d) verify, periodically and on a random basis, if(i) the querying and exploitation of those datasets were carried out in accordance with ......
  • Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act (S.C. 2012, c. 19)
    • Canada
    • Canada Gazette August 30, 2012
    • Invalid date
    ...or withheld for the purposes of giving effect to(a) any order made by the Governor in Council in respect of the province under section 15 or 16 of the Canada Health Act or, in the case of a cash contribution under section 24.5 or 24.51, section 25.3 or 25.4 of this Act; or Marginal note:200......
  • Miscellaneous Statute Law Amendment Act, 2017 (S.C. 2017, c. 26)
    • Canada
    • Canada Gazette March 08, 2018
    • Invalid date
    ...note:Certified copies(1.1) The Commissioner need not return any copy of a record produced under section 11 or obtained under section 15 or 16. 13 (1) Paragraph 103.3(1)(a) of the Act is replaced by the following:(a) to prevent the continuation of conduct that could be the subject of an orde......
  • An Act to amend the Customs Act (S.C. 2018, c. 30)
    • Canada
    • Canada Gazette March 12, 2019
    • Invalid date
    ...(a) is replaced by the following:Marginal note:General offence and punishment160 (1) Every person who contravenes section 11, 12, 13, 15 or 16, subsection 20(1), section 31 or 40, subsection 43(2), section 94, subsection 95(1) or (3), 103(3) or 107(2) or section 153, 155, 156 or 159.1 or co......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT