R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63

JudgeTholl J.A.; Richards C.J.S.; Jackson J.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Case DateTuesday July 16, 2019
JurisdictionSaskatchewan
Citations2019 SKCA 63
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 practice notes
  • R. v. T.W.W., 2024 SCC 19
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 24, 2024
    ...881; referred to: R. v. Ravelo‑Corvo, 2022 BCCA 19, 79 C.R. (7th) 128; R. v. I. (C.), 2023 ONCA 576, 168 O.R. (3d) 575; R. v. Graham, 2019 SKCA 63, [2019] 12 W.W.R. 207; R. v. T. (M.), 2012 ONCA 511, 289 C.C.C. (3d) 115; R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34; R. v. Araya, 2015 SCC 11, [2015] 1 ......
  • R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 31, 2020
    ...mistaken, belief in communicated consent. [132] The law in this area was recently canvased by the judgment of this Court in R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63, [2019] 12 WWR 207 [92] An assertion of honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent represents a denial of the mens rea of sexual assau......
  • R v Bear, 2022 SKCA 69
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 7, 2022
    ...Wolfe at para 88; Dreaver at para 29; Belcourt at para 49; R v Aisaican, 2019 SKCA 58 at para 22, 377 CCC (3d) 114 [Aisaican]; R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63 at para 27, [2019] 12 WWR 207 [39]           Bearing in mind these principles, the determ......
  • R v Napope, 2022 SKCA 61
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 18, 2022
    ...could have reasonably have rendered: R v Yebes, [1987] 2 SCR 168; R v Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15 at para 36, [2000] 1 SCR 381; R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63 at para 105, [2019] 12 WWR 207. That test is no less applicable to an appeal based on an allegation of inconsistent verdicts. [17]  &#......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
29 cases
  • R. v. T.W.W., 2024 SCC 19
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 24, 2024
    ...881; referred to: R. v. Ravelo‑Corvo, 2022 BCCA 19, 79 C.R. (7th) 128; R. v. I. (C.), 2023 ONCA 576, 168 O.R. (3d) 575; R. v. Graham, 2019 SKCA 63, [2019] 12 W.W.R. 207; R. v. T. (M.), 2012 ONCA 511, 289 C.C.C. (3d) 115; R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34; R. v. Araya, 2015 SCC 11, [2015] 1 ......
  • R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 31, 2020
    ...mistaken, belief in communicated consent. [132] The law in this area was recently canvased by the judgment of this Court in R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63, [2019] 12 WWR 207 [92] An assertion of honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent represents a denial of the mens rea of sexual assau......
  • R v Bear, 2022 SKCA 69
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 7, 2022
    ...Wolfe at para 88; Dreaver at para 29; Belcourt at para 49; R v Aisaican, 2019 SKCA 58 at para 22, 377 CCC (3d) 114 [Aisaican]; R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63 at para 27, [2019] 12 WWR 207 [39]           Bearing in mind these principles, the determ......
  • R v Napope, 2022 SKCA 61
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 18, 2022
    ...could have reasonably have rendered: R v Yebes, [1987] 2 SCR 168; R v Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15 at para 36, [2000] 1 SCR 381; R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63 at para 105, [2019] 12 WWR 207. That test is no less applicable to an appeal based on an allegation of inconsistent verdicts. [17]  &#......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT