R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63

JudgeTholl J.A.; Richards C.J.S.; Jackson J.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Case DateJuly 16, 2019
JurisdictionSaskatchewan
Citations2019 SKCA 63
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 practice notes
  • R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 31 Marzo 2020
    ...mistaken, belief in communicated consent. [132] The law in this area was recently canvased by the judgment of this Court in R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63, [2019] 12 WWR 207 [92] An assertion of honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent represents a denial of the mens rea of sexual assau......
  • R v Bear,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 7 Junio 2022
    ...Wolfe at para 88; Dreaver at para 29; Belcourt at para 49; R v Aisaican, 2019 SKCA 58 at para 22, 377 CCC (3d) 114 [Aisaican]; R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63 at para 27, [2019] 12 WWR 207 [39]           Bearing in mind these principles, the determ......
  • R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 1 Noviembre 2019
    ...to be applied by an appellate court when determining whether a verdict is unreasonable was recently restated by this Court in R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63: [105] The standard of review for an unreasonable verdict is set out in R v R.P., 2012 SCC 22, [2012] 1 SCR [9] To decide whether a verdict ......
  • R v Napope,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 18 Mayo 2022
    ...could have reasonably have rendered: R v Yebes, [1987] 2 SCR 168; R v Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15 at para 36, [2000] 1 SCR 381; R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63 at para 105, [2019] 12 WWR 207. That test is no less applicable to an appeal based on an allegation of inconsistent verdicts. [17]  &#......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
27 cases
  • R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 31 Marzo 2020
    ...mistaken, belief in communicated consent. [132] The law in this area was recently canvased by the judgment of this Court in R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63, [2019] 12 WWR 207 [92] An assertion of honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent represents a denial of the mens rea of sexual assau......
  • R v Bear,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 7 Junio 2022
    ...Wolfe at para 88; Dreaver at para 29; Belcourt at para 49; R v Aisaican, 2019 SKCA 58 at para 22, 377 CCC (3d) 114 [Aisaican]; R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63 at para 27, [2019] 12 WWR 207 [39]           Bearing in mind these principles, the determ......
  • R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 1 Noviembre 2019
    ...to be applied by an appellate court when determining whether a verdict is unreasonable was recently restated by this Court in R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63: [105] The standard of review for an unreasonable verdict is set out in R v R.P., 2012 SCC 22, [2012] 1 SCR [9] To decide whether a verdict ......
  • R v Napope,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 18 Mayo 2022
    ...could have reasonably have rendered: R v Yebes, [1987] 2 SCR 168; R v Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15 at para 36, [2000] 1 SCR 381; R v Graham, 2019 SKCA 63 at para 105, [2019] 12 WWR 207. That test is no less applicable to an appeal based on an allegation of inconsistent verdicts. [17]  &#......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT