R. v. James (G.H.), 2014 SCC 5
| Judge | LeBel, Rothstein, Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Wagner, JJ. |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | January 17, 2014 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2014 SCC 5;[2014] N.R. TBEd. JA.010;[2014] 1 SCR 80 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 practice notes
-
Mahjoub c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
...and Liberty et al. v. National Energy Board et al., [1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, (1976), 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716.DISTINGUISHED:R. v. Carosella, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 80, 142 D.L.R. (4th) 595.CONSIDERED:Mahjoub (Re), 2013 FC 1094; Mahjoub (Re), 2013 FC 1095; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. ......
-
R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
...relying on assumptions and stereotypes, it is also an error to reject otherwise admissible relevant evidence. In this regard, in R v James, 2014 SCC 5, [2014] 1 SCR 80 (affirming R v James, 2013 BCCA 159, 297 CCC (3d) 106), Moldaver J. found the trial judge to have erred because he “failed ......
-
R. v. F.I.,
...evidence of V.O.’s behaviour after the incident. This evidence is relevant to an assessment of her credibility. See: R v James, 2014 SCC 5 at para 5, [2014] 1 SCR 80. [90] ......
-
R. v. Richards (C.B.), 2016 ABQB 176
...the Supreme Court applied the exceptional circumstance standard to determine whether the delay to counsel was justified in R v Mian , 2014 SCC 5 at para 74. I am inclined to endorse the latter standard, as it is more consistently applied in case law and was applied in early 10(b) jurisprude......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
Mahjoub c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
...and Liberty et al. v. National Energy Board et al., [1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, (1976), 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716.DISTINGUISHED:R. v. Carosella, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 80, 142 D.L.R. (4th) 595.CONSIDERED:Mahjoub (Re), 2013 FC 1094; Mahjoub (Re), 2013 FC 1095; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. ......
-
R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
...relying on assumptions and stereotypes, it is also an error to reject otherwise admissible relevant evidence. In this regard, in R v James, 2014 SCC 5, [2014] 1 SCR 80 (affirming R v James, 2013 BCCA 159, 297 CCC (3d) 106), Moldaver J. found the trial judge to have erred because he “failed ......
-
R. v. F.I.,
...evidence of V.O.’s behaviour after the incident. This evidence is relevant to an assessment of her credibility. See: R v James, 2014 SCC 5 at para 5, [2014] 1 SCR 80. [90] ......
-
R. v. Richards (C.B.), 2016 ABQB 176
...the Supreme Court applied the exceptional circumstance standard to determine whether the delay to counsel was justified in R v Mian , 2014 SCC 5 at para 74. I am inclined to endorse the latter standard, as it is more consistently applied in case law and was applied in early 10(b) jurisprude......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Corner Brook (City) V Bailey: Insurers And Defence Counsel Breathe A Sigh Of Release
...the broader contractual interpretation principles prescribed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp, 2014 SCC 5. The Court of Appeal found that the release did not contemplate damages outside of Bailey's claim for personal injury and property damage. At pa......
-
Supreme Court Of Canada Confirms That Releases Are Interpreted Just Like Any Other Contract
...the broader contractual interpretation principles dictated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp.,2014 SCC 53 and determining that the lower court had erred in finding that the general wording of the release covered the third party claim brought in the ......