Table of cases

• Author: Ruth Sullivan
• Profession: Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa
• Pages: 321-333

321

TABLE OF CASES

114957 Canada Ltée (Spraytech, Société d’ar rosage) v. Hudson (Town),

[2001] 2 S.C.R. 241, 200 D.L.R. (4th) 419, 2001 SCC 40 ..............156 –57, 243

844903 Onta rio Ltd. v. Vander Pluijm (1992), 130 N.B.R. (2d) 361,

12 C.P.C. (3d) 71, [1992] N.B.J. No. 614 (Q.B.)........................................... 290

Agricult ural Credit Corp. of Saskatc hewan v. Novak, [1995]

8 W.W.R. 385, 134 Sask. R. 87, [1995] S.J. No. 338 (C.A.)..........................162

Animal A lliance of Canada v. Canada (Attor ney General), [1999]

4 F.C. 72, 168 F.T.R. 114, [1999] F.C.J. No. 696 (T.D.)................................281

Antosko v. Canada, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 312, 168 N.R. 16, [1994]

S.C.J. No. 46...........................................................................................228–29

Apotex Inc. v. Canada (Attor ney General), [2000] 4 F.C. 264,

188 D.L.R. (4th) 145, [2000] F.C.J. No. 634 (C.A.).....................................281

Apple Computer Inc. v. Macintosh Computers Ltd. (1986), [1987]

1 F.C. 173, 28 D.L.R. (4th) 178, [1986] F.C.J. No. 278 (T.D.),

aff’d (1987), [1988] 1 F.C. 673, 44 D.L.R. (4th) 74, [1987]

F.C.J. No. 916 (C.A.), aff’d [1990] 2 S.C.R. 209, 71 D.L.R.

(4th) 95, [1990] S.C.J. No. 61 ......................................................................109

Application under s. 83.28 of t he Criminal Code, (Re), [2004] 2

S.C.R. 248, 240 D.L.R. (4th) 81, 2004 SCC 42 ...................139, 239, 265, 286

Aquasource Ltd. v. Brit ish Columbia (Information and Pr ivacy

Commission), (1998), 58 B.C.L.R. (3d) 61, 8 Admin. L.R.

(3d) 236, [1998] B.C.J. No. 1927 (C.A.) ......................................................182

AstraZe neca Canada Inc. v. Canada (Mini ster of Health), [2006]

2 S.C.R. 560, 272 D.L.R. (4th) 577, 2006 SCC 49 ...............................202, 241

ATCO Gas & Pipelines Ltd. v. Alber ta (Energy & Utilities Boar d),

[2006] 1 S.C.R. 140, 263 D.L.R. (4th) 193, 2006 SCC 4 .............................123

Attorney Genera l v. Edison Telephone Co. of London (1880), 6 Q.B.D. 244 ....107

Attorney-Gener al v. Prince Erne st Augustus of Hanover, [1957]

A.C. 436 (H.L.) ............................................................................................173