Index
| Author | Maureen McTeer |
| Pages | 251-266 |
[ ]
Index
Abortion, , ,
Adoption, , –, , –, , , ,
Adoption Act, ,
Adoption of Children Act, ,
Alberta, Family Law Act
ACHR Act,
ALB v CVL,
assisted reproduction, denition,
birth registration, ,
Charter rights,
child, best interests of, ,
domestic violence,
embryo, denition,
guardianship, application for,
H (DW) v R (DJ),
human reproductive material, den-
ition,
parentage
assisted reproduction, , ,
declaration of,
order of,
presumption of (biological father),
rules of,
surrogacy,
parents, more than two, ,
same-sex relationships,
surrogate, denition, –
Vital Statistics Act,
All Families Are Equal Act (Ontario)
adopted child,
birth parent, denition,
birth parent’s spouse, , –
child
best interests of, ,
denition,
Child and Family Services Act (Ontario),
Children’s Law Reform Act (Ontario),
–
consent
birth parent’s spouse,
surrogate, ,
custody arrangements, –
Divorce Act,
donor, insemination by,
intended parent, , –
Interpretation Act (Ontario),
kindred relationships, –
Low v Low, –
ML v JC,
parent of child, determining,
parentage
assisted reproduction, , –
declaration of, ,
presumption of, –,
reproductive material,
rules of, –
sperm donor,
surrogacy, , , –, –
parental rights and responsibilities, ,
parents, more than two, ,
pre-conception parentage agreements, ,
,
R (MR) v M (J), –
[ ]
FERTILITY: 40 YEARS OF CHANGE
same-sex relationships, –
Stoughton v O’Ney, –
surrogacy, more than two parents, –
surrogacy agreements, –
Vital Statistics Act, ,
All-Party Parliamentary Group on Surro-
gacy,
Articial insemination
direct egg/sperm transfer (DOST),
Federal Royal Commission on New
Reproductive Technologies,
history, , –
insemination sites, other,
LMS v WDU, –
medical professional code, violations of,
parentage, determining, –
patient consent and trust,
Assisted Human Reproduction Act (AHR Act).
See also Assisted Human Reproduction
Act, court challenges; Assisted Human
Reproduction Canada (AHRC)
AHR practices, prohibited, ,
AHRC, –
amendments (), ,
Baird Commission recommendations
vs,
Canada’s Royal Commission on New
Reproductive Technologies,
children born through AHR technolo-
gies, ,
cloning, ,
commercialization of donors and surro-
gacy, , ,
consent, free and informed, –,
Constitution Act, , section , –
controlled activities, –, , , ,
–,
discrimination against people using
AHR, ,
embryo, denition, ,
embryonic research, , , , , –,
,
failure of, –
federal criminal laws,
federal minister of health, powers of, ,
nes for oences, ,
fourteen-day rule,
genetic sex selection,
genome editing, –
governing principles,
Health Canada, , –, , –
human genome, integrity of,
human reproductive material, denition,
,
Jobs, Growth and Long-Term Prosperity
Act amendments,
licensing, –
medical practices, prohibited, ,
Parliament passes,
potential, missed,
prohibited activities, , , –
property rights of human embryos and
gametes,
provincial laws, precedence of,
regulations, AHR, , , –
surrogacy arrangements, , , , –
synthetic embryos,
UK legislation,
ULCC parentage question,
women, protection of, ,
Assisted Human Reproduction Act, court
challenges. See also Assisted Human
Reproduction Canada (AHRC); Assisted
Human Reproduction Act (AHR Act)
Alberta,
Baird Commission and, , –
British Human Fertilisation and Embry-
ology Authority model, –
Canadian Conference of Catholic
Bishops,
challenges, remaining, –
Chief Justice McLachlin, opinion, –
Constitution Act, , –,
Court’s justices, reasoning of,
Evangelical Fellowship of Canada,
Justice Abella, opinion,
Justice Cromwell, –
Justice Deschamps, opinion, –, ,
–
Justice LeBel, opinion, –, , –
To continue reading
Request your trial