Competing Rights or Competing Context under the Charter?
Author | Errol P Mendes |
Pages | 122-146 |
CompetingRightsorCompeting
ContextundertheCharter
Errol P Mendes*
A CO N T E X T UA L EQ U I L I BR I U M V E R SU S
CO MPE TI NGR IG HTS UN DER TH E
CANADI AN CHA RTER OF RIGHTS AND
FREEDOMS
Oneofthe mostoverlookedquotesfromtheSupremeCour tofCanada
isfrom thelandmarkR v Oa kes rulingwhere DicksonJcomments on
theoverarch ingvaluesto bekept inmi ndwheninterpretingthe Can-
adian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,includingsection.Hestated that
the Charterskeyvaluesca nbefoundwit hinthe phrasefreea nddemo
cratic societyand that thos e valuesshould be us ed as the ultimate
standardforinterpretationofsectionChiefJusticeDicksondescribed
thisultimatestandardi nthefollowingterms
Inclusion of these words as the nal standard of justication for
limits onrights andfreedoms referst heCourt tothe verypurpos e
forwhicht heCharterwasoriginallyentrenchedintheConstitution
Canadian socie ty is to be free a nddemoc ratic The Court must be
gu idedby thev alues andp rinc iples esse ntia ltoaf reea ndde mocra tic
society whichI believe embodytoname buta fewrespect fort he
inherentd ignityoft hehumanperson commitmenttos ocialjustice
UniversityofOawaFacultyofLaw
CanLIISCCOakes
Competing Rights or Competing Context under the Charter?
ande qualityaccom modationofaw idevarietyof beliefsrespect for
cultural and g roup identityand fait h in social and p olitical inst itu
tions which enh ance the participation of i ndividuals and groups in
societyTheunderlyingvaluesandprinciplesofafreeanddemocratic
society arethe genesisoft herightsa ndfreedomsg uaranteedby the
Charterandt heultimates tandardagainst whicha limitona rightor
fre edommu stbes hown despi teitse ect tober easo nablea nddem on
strablyjustied
Whilet hesevalueswill inevitablyconict intheorythe Courthas
striveninOakes andinsubsequentdecisionstohunc houtajurispru
dential framework contextual equilibrium in concrete cases where
these valuesmaycon ictbecause theyinvolvecompetingcontexts in
whichrightsorvaluesclaimsaremadeInsomeoftheleadingdecisions
on the Chartertheconicthas beenb etweentwo setsof rights How
everothercases showconictbetween rightsandthe othervaluesnot
exhaustivelylisted byDicksonCJ inhis statementonthe foundational
societalvaluesofa freeanddemocraticsocietyInbothcasesbutespe
cially in cases bet ween rights and values the focus wil l immediately
turnto theproportionality analysisinsec tionofthe CharterThisan
alysis focusesprimarilyon the situationwhere thevalues underlying
twosetsofrightsmayappeartobecompeting
Eventhought hesevalueslis tedbyDicksonCJ inOakesmayconic t
intheorytheyaret hefundamentalvaluesoftheCharterTheyaresup
posedto guidenoton lythedevelopmentof thecommon lawbutalso
theinterpretationofstatutorylawinCanadaincludi ngquasiconstitu
tionalhumanrightslegislationsucha stheOntario Human Rights Code
JusticeFrank Iacobuccioneof themosti nuentialSupremeCourt
justicesin shapingtheevolutionoftheCharterhasproposedt hatthere
shouldbe afocuson reconci lingr ightsrather thanaddressing compet
ingrig htsThisis crucialbecause theSupremeCourtha sinsistedthat
thereis nohierarchyof rightstobe inferredf romthejurispr udenceof
the Charterandthatnoonerightshouldbeprivilegedattheexpens eof
anotherThispr inciplewasrmlystatedbyLa merCJintheDagenais v
Canadian Broadcasting CorporationrulingbytheSupremeCourt
Ibid atpara
RSOcHOnt HR Code
FrankIacobucciReconci lingRightsTheSupremeCourtofCanadasApproach
toCompetingCharter RightsSupreme Court Law Revi ewd
Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting CorpSCRDagenais
To continue reading
Request your trial