Nuisance and Neighbourhood in Late Nineteenth-Century Montreal: Drysdale v Dugas in its Contexts
Author | Eric H. Reiter |
Pages | 35-69 |
ヌノ
Nuisance and Neighbourhood in Late
NineteenthCenturyMontreal
DrysdalevDugas in its Contexts
EricHReiter
Introduction
Npersonal dimension that can bel ie the often relatively
modestlegalst akesinvolvedPiing neighbouragai nstneighbour andin
volving perceived invasion of the homes, workplaces, or senses of the par
ties, nuisance complaints tend to elicit vehement reactions on both sides.
One such aair is Drysdale v Dugas, which reached the Supreme Court of
Canada in Centring on a dispute between neighbours in Montreal,
the case pits Drysdale, who built and ran a stable in a residential neigh
bourhood, against Dugas, who complained of the horses’ unpleasant odours,
foulliquids and incessant noiseIt alsoh ighlights diculti ssuesof prop
erty powers and duties, fault and liability, precedent and public policy, and
remediesMoreoverast heSupremeCourt srstmajorpronouncement on
nuisance in Canada, Drysd alesinuencehasextendedbeyonditsorigins in
thecivillawofQuebecRece ntlyitsrelevancewasrearmedwhentheSu
preme Court endorsed its view of liability for nuisance in StLawrenceCement
vBarreeof
Like all nuisance cases, D rysdale sits at the intersection of t he law of prop
erty and civil liabi lity, and it reveals lawyers and judges alike seeking co
herentoratleastworkablerulesandconceptsi namurkyeldoflaw
Like all Quebec nuisance ca ses, Drysdale also st raddles the civil law and the
common law, with French and English principles and precedents mingling
ヌハEricHReiter
sometimes in concert, sometimes i n tension. Finally, like all legal cases of
whatever kind, Drysdalehas astory behindit onethatbothlls outandat
times challenges t he rather lifeless published reports of the cas e. In this
article, I use Drysdale a nd its stories to explore the intersections of doctri nal
legal principles and lived social ordering in a ti me of changing urban la nd
scapes and neighbourly relationships.
Dramatis Personae: Dugas and Drysdale
N concept. The smells, noises, smoke, vibrations, and
other physical irritants behind t he legal idea of nuisance become problem
aticwhenindividualsliveincloseproximitytooneanotheranddierences
inpersonalitiessensibilitiesandlevelsoftolerancegiverisetoconictover
the irritants. It is also, of course, a legal concept, and the pri nciples, inter
pretations and precedents of the legal system aect the so cial aspects of
nuisance as the social aspec ts aect the legal Behind bot ha re people
neighbours, lawyers, and judges — who come to litigation with previous
historieswhichprovideanotherlevelofinuenceonthecourseofthecas e
CalixteAiméDugastheplaintiinDrysda lewasaprominentandwell
connected member of the Montreal legal commun ity. Though it was no se
cret at the time, it appears nowhere in the reported judgments that Dugas
was himself a judge of the Montreal Court of Sessions, t he lower criminal
courtBornininStRéminearMontrealDugasstudiedlawwithboth
afut ureQ uebecc hiefju sticeAADorion anda futu repri memi nister of
Canada JJCAbboAfter admission tot hebar in h isfort unatecon
nections continued: he practised law with a f uture Supreme Court justice
DésiréGirouardand inma rriedSuza nneHarki nacousi nofLew is
Drummond, justice of the Quebec Court of Q ueen’s Bench. Dugas served
br ie y in mu n ic ip al go ve rn me nt an di n r an u ns uc ce s sf ul l yf or th ep ro v
incial Liberals. Soon after h is defeat he was rewarded with an appointment
as judge of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace, serving also a s extra
dition commissioner. A proponent of military training, Dugas belonged to
thethBaalionMountRoyalRiesandsawactivedutyasaMajorlater
promotedtoLieutenantColonelduring theNorthWestRebellion of
Dugas was also a member of several prestigious Montreal clubs, mingli ng
with the francophone elite at the Club Canadien and the a nglophone elite at
the Metropolitan Club.
NuisanceandNeighbourhoodinLateNineteenthCenturyMontrealヌヒ
Besides his position as judge and his general knowledge of the law,
two other aspects of Dugas’s personal history factor into this l itigation: his
litigiousness and a speculat ive streak. Like many legal professionals with
knowledge of their rights and a drive to vindicate them, Dugas was involved
inanumberoflegalac tionsovertheyearsAl readyinthesasayoung
lawyerhepart icipatedin awellpublicized fracas overhis having hitched
his horse to a gatepost, as a result of which he was arrested for allegedly
assaulting a constable. Tellingly, he not only defended himself again st the
charge but launched a suit against the constable and the City of
Montreal for false arrest and violation of his rights.I ni nanothe rcause
célèbre, Dugas successful ly brought private criminal l ibel charges against Ed
mundSheppardow nerof thes ensationalist anda ntiFrenchTorontoEv en-
ing News, over articles al leging cowardice, looting, and desert ion by Dugas’s
regiment during the Rebell ion. Dugas also appears in various cases con
nected to his business deali ngs, such as a breach of contract suit arising from
plans to form a company to exploit an invention to turn garbage into fuel.
JudgeDugasMontrealQCbyWilliamNotma nSonDecemberThis
photograph of Dugas, like the pho to of Drysdale below, is by Montreal’s premier society
photographerWilliamNotma nMcCordMuseumIIReproducedwithpermiss ion
To continue reading
Request your trial