Pirate or Prophet? Monsanto Canada Inc. v Schmeiser
Author | Patricia L. Farnese |
Pages | 425-454 |
ネニノ
Pirate or Prophet?
MonsantoCanadaIncvSchmeiser
PatriciaLFarnese
Introduction
TS C Canada’s (SCC) decision in MonsantoCanadaIncvSch-
meiseris likely most remembered for what it did not decide. By beginning
the majority’s decision with an outline of what the court would not address,
McLachlin CJ and Fish J, clearly understood that much of the public’s inter
estinthiscaseconcernedanumberofbroaderissuesSpecicallythecourt
stated:
weemphasize from theoutset that weare notconcer nedhere with thei n
nocentdiscoverybyfarmersofblowbypatentedplantsontheirlandorin
theircultivatedeldsNorareweconcernedwiththescopeoftherespond
entspatent orthe wisdom andsoc ialuti lityof the geneticmodicat ionof
genesa ndcells apractice authorized by Parliamentu nderthe PatentAct
and its regu lations.
Nonetheless, the story of Monsantov Schme iser is as much the story of
howthiscasedrewg lobalaentiontothesebroaderissuesasitisaboutthe
narrow issue of patent infringement. Th is story is also about two fascinat
ing protagonists, Monsanto and Percy Schmeiser, in what has often be en
described asa modern balebetween David andGoliath For many, Sch
meiser, like David, remains a folk hero whose ongoing public life continues
todrawaentiontothiscase
ネニハPatriciaLFarnese
Monsanto
M agricultural biotechnologycompanyItsnet
sales from its seeds and genomics and agric ultural productivity divisions
wereclosetobil lionUSD The seeds and genomics divi sion sells prod
ucts with biotechnology traits while t he agricultural productivity divi sion
mainly refers to the company’s agricultural chemical bu siness. The com
pany’s sale of glyphosate, branded as Roundup, constitutes the majority of
its chemical business. Monsanto’s commodity crop seeds — such as can
olacoonsoybeansand cornareglobal lyavailable Monsanto’s global
reach comes through both the di rect marketing of its own branded seeds
and chemicals, and thr ough the licensing of its patented technology and
genetic material to other companies.
Monsanto, however, did not begin as an agriculture company and for
many, what Monsanto was cannot be sepa rated from what Monsanto has
becomeInJohnFQueenyformedacompanyandpurchasedt hema
terials and technology to produce sacchar ine. Queeny chose to use his wife
Olga’s maiden name, Monsanto, as his new company’s name. Derived from
benzoicsulmidea ndsignicantlysweeter thansucroseQ ueenyhopedto
provide a local source of saccharine in t he US. His investment was rewarded
when The Coca Cola Co. purchased all of the saccha rine Monsanto produced
inand ByMonsant ohaddevelop edothe rchem icaladdit ives
for use in food products including vanil linandcaeine
Fueled by its success in the food additive business, Monsanto continued
to expand and diversify its chemical busi ness. Monsanto began to manufac
turesty reneandpolystyrene plasticswhichby theswerethecent ral
focusofitsbusine ssInMonsantohadthem isfortuneofbecomi ngin
volved in what has been described as the “most devastating industrial acci
dent in US history.” A French freighter, the S.S.Grandcamp, was unloading
ammoniumnitratefertilizerwhenitcaughtreintheTexasCityharbour
Monsanto was located dockside. Thus, when the S.SGrandcamp ex ploded,
itt riggered res at the Monsanto facility resu lting in hundreds of deaths
and thousands of injuries. In addition to the loss of many of its employees,
Monsantospolystyrenefacilitysueredconsiderabledamageand released
fueloilbenzeneandstyreneintotheenvironment The Texas City disaster
introduced most of the public to Monsanto.
Monsanto’s involvement with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) during
thesandslikelyunderliessomeofthepublicdist rustofMonsanto
To continue reading
Request your trial