Ancillary Claims for Damages in Employment Law
Author | Robert L. Colson and A. Jane Milburn |
Pages | 427-446 |
AncillaryClaimsforDamagesin
Employment Law
Robert L. Colson and A. Jane Milburn*
A. INTRODUCTION
Fewwouldargue withthe propositionthat theworkplacehas cometo
occupy an everincreasing role in how individuals withi n our society
denethemselvesa ndtheirrelat ionshiptoothers Itsimpactgoes well
beyondthephysical boundariesof theemploymentenvironment itaf-
fectshow weperceive ourselveshowwe dealw ithothers bothi nside
andoutsideoftheworkplaceandourfundamentalunderlyingsenseof
selfworthwhichin turnimpactsou rfamilyrelationships andmanyof
ourpersonalvalues
Thistrendconti nuestogrowandshowseverysignthatitsmomen-
tumwillbema intainedfortheforeseeablefutureWorkisbecomingan
increasinglyimportantdeninginuenceinourlivesandthecourtsare
becomingmore aunedto andwilli ngtorecog nizethe signicanceof
workondeningwhoweareasindividualsandasasocietyThecourts
are increasinglyaware of thepower imbalance in therelationsh ipbe-
tweenemployersandemployeesInthiscontextitsta ndstoreasonthat
ourlegal systemwi llbe calledupon torecog nizeth isreality and that
thecourt swill respondbyre examining boththe natureand extentof
theremedies availableto employeesupon termination ofemployment
Anumberof judgmentsinrecent yearshaveacknowledgedthe impor-
RobertColsonandJaneMi lburnarepart nersinthermofTeplitskyColsonLLP
ThankstoJen niferLakestudentatlawforherresearchass istance
RLCAJM
tanceofemploymentandcommenteduponthenatureandqualityofthe
employmentrelationshipandtheunderlyingcontractbetweenemployer
andemployeeThatcontractisincertainrespectsfundamentallydier-
entf romthe bargain that one wouldexpect might be struck between
equallyempoweredpartiesdealingwithoneanot heratarmslength
Thereisnoh igherauthorityandperhapsnobeerstatementof the
disparitythatexistsbetweenemployerandemployeethanthejudgment
ofIacobucciJinWallacevUnitedGrainGrowersLtd1whoadoptsthelan-
guageofSwintonJthenaprofessorwhowrote
t he terms of the employment contract ra rely result from an exer-
ciseof freeba rgainingp owerinthe waythat theparadigm commer-
cialexcha ngebetweentwo tradersdoesIndividual employeesonthe
wholelackboth thebargain ingpowerand theinformat ionnecessary
toachievemorefavourablecontractprovisionsthanoeredbytheem-
ployerparticularlywithregardtotenure2
JusticeIacobuccicontinues
Thispowerimbala nceisnotlimitedtotheemploymentcontrac titself
Ratheriti nformsvir tuallyal lfacets oftheemployment relationship
InSlaightCommunicationsIncvDavidsonSCRDickson
CJwritingforthemajorityoftheCourthadocca siontocommenton
thenatureoft hisrelationshipAtpphequotedwithapproval
fromPDavies andM FreedlandK hanFreudsLabourand theLaw
rdedatp
Therelationbetweenanemployerandanisolatedemployee
orworker is typically ar elationbet weena bearer of power
and one who is not a bearer of power In its inception it is
anact ofsubmissioni nitsoperationit isacondition ofsub-
ordination
The vulnerabi lityof employeesis underscoredby the levelof im-
portance which oursociet yaaches to employmentAs DicksonC J
notedinRef erence Re Public Service EmployeeRelati onsActAlta
SCRatp
SCRWallace
KatherineSwi ntonContractLawandtheEmploymentRelation shipTheProper
ForumforReforminBarr yJReiterJohnSwanedsStudies in Contract Law
TorontoBuerworthsat
To continue reading
Request your trial