Workplace Harassment Law in Ontario
Author | Soma Ray-Ellis and Matthew A. Biderman |
Pages | 135-187 |
WorkplaceHarassmentLaw
in Ontario
SomaRayEllisandMahewABiderman*
A. INTRODUCTION
Theevolutionofworkplaceharas smentandhuma nrights lawprovides
afascinatinglookatsocietysstereotypesaboutgenderandraceandour
needtomovebeyondthemI narecent articlepublished bytheRotman
Schoolof ManagementJennifer Berdah lnoted thatthe origi nal proto-
typeof sexualharassmentwhichsuggests thatthe mostfrequentlyt ar-
getedwomenarethosewhomeetphysicalandpersonalitycharacteristics
ofgender ideals does notcapture t hereal ity oft heworkplace In her
researchshe ndst hatThe mostcommonform of sexualharassment
appearsto be motivated byhosti lity towardthose who violate gender
idealsrather t han by desire for those who meet themThisphenom-
enonshesaysismoreproperlyreferredtoasgenderharassmentSocial
scienceresearchsuch asthishas contributedtothedevelopmentofanti
harassmentlawtheaimofwhichisgreaterfairnessintheworkplacefor
womenminoritiesandotherswhomaybetargetsofharassment
This paperprovidesa review ofantiworkplaceharassmentlawi n
Ontariowithaspecicfocusonthetwomostcommonlylitigatedforms
* SomaRayEllisistheheadoft heEmploymentandPrivacya ndPublicLawGroup
atPatersonMacDougallLLPwheresheisapar tnerMahewBidermanisa nas-
sociatelawyerwithPaters onMacDougallLLP
JenniferBerda hlTheEvolutionofHarassme ntintheWorkplaceRotman: The
MagazineoftheRotmanSchoolof ManagementWinterat
SREMAB
sexual and racial harassment Wh ile harassment claims based on t he
otherenumerated grounds arelit igatedless frequentlythe legislation
andmuch of the jurisprudence is applicableto all forms of workplace
harassmentregardlessofthespecicground
Currentlyhumanrightslawandtheregimeinplacetolitigatethese
issuesareundergoingsignicanttransitionAmendmentstotheOntario
Human Rights Codere ceivedRoyalAss enton December under
theHumanRightsCodeAmendmentAct alsoreferredtoasBil l
Generallyspeaki ngthea mendmentsserveto abolishthew ideinvesti-
gationand screeni ngf unction ofthe Ontario Human Rights Commis-
siontheCommissionrevisethepowersandproceduresoftheHuman
RightsTribunal of Ontario theTribunala ndprovidedirect accessto
the Tribunal for applications alleging inf ringement of the Codes dis-
crimination andharassmentprovision sWhereappropriatethispaper
examinesspecicamendmentstotheCodethatareofparticularinterest
forworkplaceharassmentlawEachoftheseamendmentswillcomeinto
forceonadatetobenamedbytheLieutenantGovernorAtthistimeno
suchdatehasbeennamed
Thepaperisseparatedintothreemai npartsanoverviewofthe
central provisions of the Code addressingworkplace harassment a
reviewof workplaceharassment jurisprudence inOntariowith a spe-
cicfocusonsexuala ndracialharassmentandananalysisofrecent
developmentsinOntario
CODE
Harassmentisasub setorformofdi scrimination andaccordinglytri-
bunalshaveappliedtheCodesgeneralemploymentdiscrim inationpro-
visioninconjunctionwitht heCodes specicharassmentprovisionsto
SeessandoftheOntarioHuman Rights Codeinfra noteforanexhaust ive
listoftheenumeratedg rounds
RSOcHCode
SOcHRCAAPursuanttossscameinto
forceandeectonDecem berPursuanttosssandwill
comeintoforceandeectonadat etobenamedbytheLieuten antGovernorAt
thetimeofwrit ingadatehasnotbe ennamed
Seetheexplan atorynoteinBillatthi rdreadingcu rrentlyavailableon line
wwwontlaoncadocumentsBil lsParliamentsessioni ndexhtmbill
HRCAA supra notes
WorkplaceHarassmentLawinOntario
workplaceharassmentsc enariosT hegeneral employmentdiscr imina-
tionprovisionislocatedatsection
Every person has aright to equal treatment with respect toem -
ployment without discrimi nation because of race ancestr yplace of
origincolourethnicorig incitizensh ipcreedsexsexualorientation
agerecordofoencesmaritalstatusfa milystatusordisabi lity
Whileharassmenti saformofdiscr iminationitreceivesseparatetreat-
mentfromthelegislat ureundertheCode Harassment isdenedatsec-
tion
haras smentmeansengagingi nacourseofvexatiouscomment
orconduct thatis known orought reasonably tobe known tobe un-
welcome
Racialharassmentint heworkplaceisspecicallyprohibitedundersec-
tion
Everypersonwhoisanemployeehasarighttofreedomfromharassment
in the workplace bytheemployeroragentoftheemployerorbyanother
employee because of race ancest ryplaceoforigincolourethnicorigin
citizensh ipcreedagerecordofoencesmarital statusfamilyst atus
ordisability
Ascanbeseenharassmentonthebasisofsexisnotincludedinthispro-
visionTheproh ibitionagainstworkplacesexualharassmentand inap-
propriategenderrelated comment andconduct isleg islatedseparately
andlocatedu ndersection A relatedprohibitionagai nstsexua lso-
licitationor advanceby aperson in aposit ionto confergrant ordeny
benetisfoundundersectionaAreprisal orthreatof reprisalfor
therejectionofasexualsolicitat ionoradvancebyapersoninaposition
toconfergrantordenybenetisprohibitedundersectionb
Everypersonwhoisanemployeehasarighttofreedomfromharassment
intheworkplacebecauseofsexbyhisorheremployeroragentoftheem-
ployerorbyanotheremployee
Everypersonhasarighttobefreefr om
a asexualsolicitationor advancemadebyaperso ninapos itionto
confergrantordenyabenetoradvancementtothepersonwhere
Supranote
Ibid. emphasisaddedSeealsot herelatedgroundsofplaceofor igincolour
ethnicorig inandcreedt hatcanallbesa idtofallgenerallyw ithinthecat egoryof
racialdiscr imination
To continue reading
Request your trial