Obligations, Pitfalls, and Contradictions in the Law of Hiring, Negligence, and Performance Reviews

AuthorPeter Israel and Carita Pereira
Pages77-100

ObligationsPitfallsand
ContradictionsintheLaw
ofHiringNegligenceand
PerformanceReviews
Peter Israel and Carita Pereira*
A. INTRODUCTION
Overthe yearswehaves eena completetransformationof theemploy-
mentrelationshipfromthedaysofmasterandservantCentraltothis
transformation aret hedevelopmentsin employmentlaw inwh ichthe
courtshaveembracedaconceptualshiinthemannerinwhichtheem-
ployeeasanentityisperceivedTheevolutioninthewayemployeesare
conceptualizedisepitomizedbythenotionthatemployeesasagroupare
vulnerablelackinginbargaini ngpowerorstrengthAnexaminationof
recentcase lawdemonstratesthat characterizing employeesasawhole
asbeingi navul nerablepositionvis-à-vis employershasnowbecomea
foundationalpri nciplein employmentlawThere is nodoubt thatt his
principleplaysasignicantroleinemploymentdecisionsThequestion
ishow signicant shouldth isrole beWh ilei nequality ofbargain ing
powermaybearealityintheinteractionsbetweensomeemployersand
employeesthesimplefactisthatitisnottherealityinallsituationsThe
vulnerableemployeeisnotauniversalfactwhichshouldbeacceptedas
astandard assumptionapplicableto allc asesTothe contraryasenior
executiveoen has a level ofsophi sticationknowledgeand experti se
thatbeliestheideaofunequalbargainingpowerInfactitisnotuncom-
monthatitistheexecutivewhondsherselfinapositionofpowerwith
signicantleverageovertheemployer
 PeterIsraelandCaritaPerei raarebothpart nersatIsraelFoulonLLP
PICP
Thispaper willexa minesome areasin employmentlawwheret he
conceptsofinequalit yofbargainingp owerandemployeevulnerability
frequentlyplay arole int hecourtsdecisionmaking orform the basis
fortheapplicablelegislative provisionswhetherby wayofexplicitref-
erenceoru nderlyingassumptions Thispaper willlook atthe lawsur-
roundingpre employmentnegligentmi srepresentationsa ndwrongf ul
hireclaimsItwillalsoexploreotherissuesarisinginthehiringprocess
including human rights considerations relating to job advertisements
applicationformsinterviewsandmedicalexaminationsaswellascon-
ductingemployeecreditchec ksandcr iminal recordchecksFin allyan
analysis of the keyi ssuesr elatedto performa ncerev iewspart icularly
withrespecttoconstr uctivedismissalwil lbeprovided
 
The Wrongful Hire Claim
Whenemployersandemployeesaregoing throughthe courtingpro-
cess prior to entering into an employment relationship both parties
haveaninterestinpui ngtheirbestfaceforwardi nordertoaractthe
otherThusan employeemayembellishher previousexper ienceoran
employermay overstate the familia l and supportive atmosphere that
its companyprovides Howevert here is a ne line between port ray-
ingoneselfforajobprospec tinafavourablelightandmisrepresenting
onesabilities orthe tr uenatureof an employmentopport unityOnce
this line is c rossed the result can be liabil ity fornegl igentm isrepre-
sentationwhether the misrepresentationr elatestost atementsactual ly
madeoromiingtodiscloserelevantinformation
The starting poi ntfor any di scussion regarding preemployment
negligent misrepresentations must be the leading Supreme Court of
CanadadecisioninQueenvCognosIncInthiscasetheCourthadtode-
terminewhether thepreemploymentrepresentations madebytheem-
ployerduringthehiringprocesscrossedthelineintothetortofnegligent
misrepresentationMrQueen wasach arteredaccountant employedin
ar elativelywell paying and secu remanagerial position Howeverhe
wanted to nd a job that would make more use of his expertise a nd
wouldprovidehimwithmorechallengingopportunitiesCognosIncor-
poratedwaslookingforanaccountanttohelpdevelopanewproductline
ofaccounti ngsoware Duri ngMr Queensinterviewhe wastold by
 RSEchlinC MThomlinso nForBeerorForWorseAPracticalGuid etoCanadian
EmploymentLawAuroraONAuroraProfessionalPre ss
 CCELSCCCognos

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT