The Evolution of Inducement
Author | Brian A. Grosman, Q.C. and R. Mark Fletcher |
Pages | 369-399 |
TheEvolutionofInducement
BrianAGrosmanQCandRMarkFletcher*
A. INTRODUCTION
Canadianemployersandemployeesareinthemidstofaneverexpand-
ingglobaleconomict ransformationfueledto alargeextentby revolu-
tionarytec hnologicaladvancesi ncomputerstelecommunicationsand
digitalelectron icsAscommerce hasbecomeincreasinglyglobalithas
also become predominantly knowledge and service based as op-
posedtoitsmoretraditionalunderpinningsinthetradeandexchangeof
tangiblegoodsConsequentlyoverthepasttwodecadesmostCanadian
businesseshavebeenforcedtoadapttoandadoptnewtechnologiesand
modesofdoing businessin ordertosur viveina erceglobalcompeti-
tiveenviron mentThe new realitiesfaced by employershavealso not
surprisingly impacted on employeesEmployees must now arguably
more than at any other point in history be more knowledgeableand
skilled sot hatthey are beerable to eectivelycompete in theg lobal
workforceandremainhighlyvaluedwithintheirindustryMovementof
highlysoughta eremployeesbetweenorgan izationsis commonplace
whiletraditionalconceptsofloyaltytoonesemployerhavediminished
Lifetimeemploymentwithoneemployerisnotpartofcommercialreal-
ityIntodaysfastpacedandgloballycompetitiveeconomyemployment
relationshipsareoenformeda ndterminatedathighspeed muchlike
BrianGrosmanist hefoundingandse niorpartnerofGrosma nGrosmanGale
LLPMarkFletcherisanassociateatGrosm anGrosmanGaleLLP
BAGRMF
the operation of the technology that has encouraged th is commercial
transformationTothriveanorganizat ionmustbepositionedtoquickly
aracttoptalenttoitsenterpriseorloseouttoitscompetitorsPotential
employersoenoerinducementstoaractthebestemployeesInaddi-
tionprofessional recruiters arerouti nelyhired toseek outand recruit
thebestandthebrightest
Todayseconomicrealitieschallengecurrentcommonlawprinciples
thatgoverntheemploymentrelationshipParticularscrutinyisrequired
oftheinceptionoftheemploymentrelationshipanditsconnectiontothe
principleoflawfultermin ationoftheemploymentcontractuponreason-
ablenotice
Themainfactorsconsideredbythecourtstodayindeterm iningthe
appropriateperiodofreasonablenoticeweredevelopedseveraldecades
agoinaverydierenteconomicclimateTheformerChiefJusticeofOn-
tario de cided Bardal vGlobe and Mailt he leadingca seon reason able
noticefortysevenyearsagoinThis isnottosuggestthatt heBar-
dal factorsareoutdatedirrelevantorincapableofbeingappliedbyt he
courtsto determinejust andfair periodsofrea sonablenoticetodayTo
thecontrar ytheBa rdalfactors haveendured through thedecades and
shouldconti nueto do soi nthe new economyHowevercourts today
mustemploytheBardalfactorstodeterminereasonablenoticeinlightof
currenteconomicrealities
Inaddition tothe Bardal factorsdeterminingwhat constitutesrea-
sonablenoticeina wrongfuldismi ssalcaseoenr equiresthecour tsto
reviewotherfactorssuchaswhethertheemployeewasinducedorlured
awayfromsecureemploymentbytheemployerCourtswillusuallyex-
tendtheperiodofreasonablenoticewhereitisfoundthattheemployee
wasenticedtoleavesecureemploymentbypromisessucha scareerad-
vancementgreaterresponsibilityjobsecurityandbeercompensation
Howeverthese factors appear to be less important to the a nalysis as
timeelapses
Corporateemployersarerequiredtoadaptrapidlytochangingmar-
ketdemandsandmustaccordinglybe abletoeectivelyandeciently
terminatetheemploymentofindividualswhonolongerservethecurrent
TheBaleforBrainpowerT heEconomistOctober
DLRdOntHCJBardal InBardalMcRuerCJidentiedthe
followingfactorsases sentialtodeterm iningtheper iodofreasonablenoticethe
characterofthee mploymenttheemployeeslengthofservicetheemployees
ageandtheavailabilityofsim ilaremploymenthavingrega rdtotheemployees
experiencetrai ningandqua lications
WallacevUnitedGrainGrowersLtd SCRWallac e
To continue reading
Request your trial